A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Vessel patency post irreversible electroporation. | LitMetric

Vessel patency post irreversible electroporation.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

Department of Radiology, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, 1475 N.W. 12 Avenue, Miami, FL, 33136, USA,

Published: December 2014

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) on vessel patency in close proximity to the ablation zone.

Materials And Methods: Between January 2010 and November 2013, 101 patients underwent percutaneous IRE procedures using the NanoKnife for primary and metastatic tumors in different organs. Age ranged from 24 to 83 years. A total of 129 lesions were treated. [liver (100), pancreas (18), kidney (3), pelvis (1), aorto-caval lymph nodes (2), adrenal (2), lung (1), retroperitoneal (1), surgical bed of a prior Whipple procedure (1)]. Post treatment contrast-enhanced CT and MRI scans were reviewed to evaluate caliber, patency, and flow defects of vessels in close proximity to the ablation zone (defined as vessels within 0-1 cm from the treatment zone).

Results: A total of 158 vessels were examined for patency on follow-up. The mean distance of the vessel from the treatment zone was 2.3 ± 2.5 mm. Ten vessels within the treatment zone were encased by tumor. Mean tumor size was 2.7 + 1.5 cm. Overall mean follow-up was 10.3 months. Abnormal vascular changes were noted in 7 of 158 (4.4%) vessels. No significant association was found between distances from the treatment zone and presence of narrowing/thrombosis at the follow-up imaging. (Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.772; logistic regression: p = 0.593; odds ratio: 0.908; CI 0.637-1.294).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates safety of IRE for the treatment of tumors near the large blood vessels and tumors already encasing the vessels. Further studies to substantiate these findings are essential to validate this crucial advantage of IRE.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0988-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment zone
12
vessel patency
8
irreversible electroporation
8
close proximity
8
proximity ablation
8
vessels
7
treatment
6
patency post
4
post irreversible
4
electroporation purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!