Efficacy and safety of nadifloxacin for bacterial skin infections: results from clinical and post-marketing studies.

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)

Wockhardt Ltd., Wockhardt Towers, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai, 400051, India.

Published: December 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • - Skin and soft tissue infections affect a significant percentage of hospitalized patients and nadifloxacin, a topical fluoroquinolone, has shown effectiveness against various bacterial strains, but there's limited data on its efficacy compared to other treatments in India.
  • - The study involved 272 patients with mild to moderate skin infections and compared nadifloxacin with mupirocin, framycetin, and fusidic acid across multiple clinical studies.
  • - Results indicated that nadifloxacin significantly reduced infection symptoms more effectively than the other treatments and was well-tolerated, with very few reported adverse effects.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Skin and soft tissue infections involve microbial invasion of the skin and underlying soft tissues and are estimated to affect 7-10% of hospitalized patients worldwide. Nadifloxacin, a topical fluoroquinolone, has been shown to be effective against aerobic Gram-negative, Gram-positive (including MRSA and coagulase-negative staphylococci), and anaerobic bacteria. However, there is paucity of data comparing efficacy and safety of 1% nadifloxacin with other anti-bacterials for skin infections in Indian patients.

Methods: This article presents the results of one post-marketing surveillance (PMS) and three randomized, open, non-blinded, multi-centric clinical studies that compared nadifloxacin with mupirocin and framycetin, and nadifloxacin with fusidic acid. Patients in India, aged from 1 to 65 years old, suffering from mild to moderate bacterial skin infections including impetigo, secondarily infected wounds, folliculitis, infected atopic dermatitis, and furunculosis were randomly allocated to three treatment groups within the studies. Efficacy was assessed by the evaluation of symptoms of erythema, exudation, swelling, pruritus, crusting, pain and tenderness in all the studies.

Results: A total of 272 subjects were enrolled in the study and subjects were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups; 92 in the nadifloxacin group, 90 in the mupirocin group, and 90 in the framycetin group. A significant reduction in the mean scores for bacterial infection symptoms in the nadifloxacin groups was observed when compared to mupirocin, framycetin and fusidic acid groups. Both physician and patients rated nadifloxacin as excellent (complete remission of symptoms) on a 4-point scale in the studies. No adverse events (AEs) were reported in the clinical studies. In the PMS, only two patients (of 329, 0.6%) reported AEs including burning and itching, one in each patient that had resolved at the time of reporting.

Conclusion: Nadifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, is a new alternative topical agent in the treatment of bacterial skin infection with minimal AEs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4257952PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13555-014-0062-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bacterial skin
12
skin infections
12
nadifloxacin
9
efficacy safety
8
safety nadifloxacin
8
clinical studies
8
mupirocin framycetin
8
fusidic acid
8
three treatment
8
treatment groups
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!