Over the last decade, endoscopy has been increasingly utilized in craniosynostosis surgery. In 2006, the author added endoscopy followed by helmet therapy to the treatment of young craniosynostosis patients. Since then, 73 children have been successfully treated utilizing endoscopic techniques with a transfusion rate of 23%. Most children are discharged on the first postoperative day; helmet therapy begins one week later. A helmet is worn for 4 to 6 months with one helmet replacement. Complications were limited to three reoperations to address suboptimal results, and one reoperation for a persisting skull defect. One sagittal sinus injury was addressed successfully, with resolution of a small intrasinus thrombus and no adverse brain sequelae. Although not applicable to every craniosynostosis patient, properly applied endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery is safe and effective, adding another option to the treatment armamentarium for craniosynostosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154971 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384810 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Frontal Sinus Volume in Normocephalic Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Study.
J Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate frontal sinus volume as a potential indicator of cranial compensatory growth in unoperated normocephalic nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis (NNSC) patients compared with age-matched and sex-matched controls. Previous studies have suggested that frontal sinus volume is suppressed in unoperated craniosynostosis and may be an intracranial space conservation phenomenon.
Methods: Head computed tomographies (CTs) from 22 unoperated NNSC patients at our institution were utilized in this study and matched with age-matched and sex-matched control subjects.
Long-Term Outcomes of Regional Morphology in Spring-Assisted Surgery and Cranial Vault Remodeling.
Plast Reconstr Surg
February 2025
From the Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
Background: Spring-assisted surgery (SAS) and cranial vault remodeling (CVR) are widely used surgical techniques to correct sagittal craniosynostosis (SC). The authors evaluated changes in regional morphology of patients with SC who had undergone SAS or CVR, using the frontal bossing index (FBI), occipital bulleting index, vertex narrowing index (VNI), and scaphocephalic severity index (SCI) to capture differences in anterior protrusion, posterior protrusion, width restriction, and global dysmorphology, respectively.
Methods: Indices were measured on computed tomography and 3-dimensional photographs (n = 788) of 257 patients with SC from 2001 through 2022 who underwent SAS (n = 177) or CVR (n = 80).
Two-Year Progressive Cranial Changes Following the Melbourne Technique for Sagittal Craniosynostosis.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Objective: The Melbourne technique for total cranial vault remodeling aims to address all aspects of scaphocephaly in sagittal craniosynostosis. These features include anterior-posterior excessive length, anteriorly displaced vertex position, frontal bossing, vertex narrowing, and occipital bulleting. This study aimed to determine the progressive cranial changes that occur following the Melbourne technique for sagittal craniosynostosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerioperative Outcomes of Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty, Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Conventional Expansion in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Department of Physiology and Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Objectives: This study compares perioperative outcomes between spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC), distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional expansion in craniosynostosis surgery.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Setting: Retrospective and prospective cohort.
Fronto-orbital advancement: Comparison of syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
January 2025
Private Clinic, Cinnah street, No:37/26, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address:
Craniosynostosis causes functional and aesthetic problems that require fronto-orbital advancement in patients to correct the cranial deformity and to prevent functional problems due to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). In this study, demographic information, operative details, preoperative clinical findings, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed for 106 craniosynostosis patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. Many factors such as functional losses due to increased ICP before surgery, resynostosis, fronto-orbital relapse, surgical complications and aesthetic results were compared in syndromic and non-syndromic patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!