Optimizing the regularization for image reconstruction of cerebral diffuse optical tomography.

J Biomed Opt

Berlin Institute of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Machine Learning Group, Marchstraße 23, Berlin 10587, GermanybBernstein Focus Neurotechnology, Department of Computer Science, Marchstraße 23, Berlin 10587, Germany.

Published: September 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and diffuse optical tomography (DOT) are noninvasive techniques for monitoring brain activity by measuring changes in near-infrared light absorption and producing three-dimensional images with better resolution.
  • The challenge in reconstructing brain activity images using DOT arises from the need to solve an underdetermined inverse problem, making the choice of regularization methods crucial for accurate results.
  • This study introduces a cross-validation approach to independently select regularization parameters and evaluates seven different image reconstruction methods, highlighting their varying impacts on the quality of cerebral functional DOT reconstructions.

Article Abstract

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an optical method for noninvasively determining brain activation by estimating changes in the absorption of near-infrared light. Diffuse optical tomography (DOT) extends fNIRS by applying overlapping “high density” measurements, and thus providing a three-dimensional imaging with an improved spatial resolution. Reconstructing brain activation images with DOT requires solving an underdetermined inverse problem with far more unknowns in the volume than in the surface measurements. All methods of solving this type of inverse problem rely on regularization and the choice of corresponding regularization or convergence criteria. While several regularization methods are available, it is unclear how well suited they are for cerebral functional DOT in a semi-infinite geometry. Furthermore, the regularization parameter is often chosen without an independent evaluation, and it may be tempting to choose the solution that matches a hypothesis and rejects the other. In this simulation study, we start out by demonstrating how the quality of cerebral DOT reconstructions is altered with the choice of the regularization parameter for different methods. To independently select the regularization parameter, we propose a cross-validation procedure which achieves a reconstruction quality close to the optimum. Additionally, we compare the outcome of seven different image reconstruction methods for cerebral functional DOT. The methods selected include reconstruction procedures that are already widely used for cerebral DOT [minimum l2-norm estimate (l2MNE) and truncated singular value decomposition], recently proposed sparse reconstruction algorithms [minimum l1- and a smooth minimum l0-norm estimate (l1MNE, l0MNE, respectively)] and a depth- and noise-weighted minimum norm (wMNE). Furthermore, we expand the range of algorithms for DOT by adapting two EEG-source localization algorithms [sparse basis field expansions and linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamforming]. Independent of the applied noise level, we find that the LCMV beamformer is best for single spot activations with perfect location and focality of the results, whereas the minimum l1-norm estimate succeeds with multiple targets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.9.096006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

regularization parameter
12
image reconstruction
8
diffuse optical
8
optical tomography
8
brain activation
8
inverse problem
8
cerebral functional
8
functional dot
8
cerebral dot
8
dot
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!