Introduction: Cervical subaxial malalignment due to complete or partial post-traumatic dislocation is generally associated to neurological impairment of ranging severity. Literature lacks reporting this entity in patients with no neurological issues. Cervical traction is not widely accepted in treating this kind of injury, due to its potential for neurological damage, although surgery seems to represent the gold standard.
Materials And Methods: We studied in detail 18 cervical subaxial severe dislocations and ptosis, especially analyzing 2 personal cases plus 5 from the literature without neurological impairment. We discuss the role of pre-operative cervical traction and its influence on the overall surgical planning and outcome.
Results: Sixteen cases of anterior complete luxation were described in detail by literature. Five patients were reported having no associated neurological impairment and three were treated by pre-operative traction. Our two cases of cervical subaxial dislocation due to bi-pedicular fractures without neurological deficits were treated by traction and surgical fixation.
Conclusions: Subaxial bi-pedicular fracture is a highly unstable condition of the cervical spine. Complete or incomplete dislocation requires instrumented fixation. An intact neurological status is very rare. Pathological canal enlargement seems to be able to protect the spinal cord, during trauma and/or traction. For these findings, cervical traction could be applied with no excessive worrying. We prefer a progressive traction up to 20 lb, administered in 7-10 days with no intubation and close neuro-vascular status monitoring. Good pre-operative realignment can be properly achieved in the majority of cervical dislocations, thus avoiding three-stage surgery and somatectomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3560-z | DOI Listing |
Iowa Orthop J
January 2025
UBMD Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Doctors, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems across the United States resources were consumed caring for COVID-19 patients. Past research on trauma activations during COVID-19 has found changes to hospital length of stay and discharge locations. Subaxial spine fractures are potentially debilitating injuries that require timely surgery and extensive rehabilitation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurosurgery
September 2024
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Background And Objectives: Vertebral artery injury (VAI) because of traumatic subaxial cervical spine injury is a rare but potentially devastating condition as it could lead to stroke. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and radiographic predictors of VAI in patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical spine injuries at a tertiary care trauma center.
Methods: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study, including all patients surgically treated for traumatic subaxial cervical spine injuries at the study center between 2006 and 2018.
Neurospine
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kobe Rosai Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Objective: To identify factors associated with the absence of cervical spine instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Methods: Cervical spine instability was defined as the presence of at least one of the following: atlantoaxial subluxation, vertical subluxation of the axis, or subaxial subluxation. In 2001-2002, 634 enrolled outpatients with "classical" or "definite" RA underwent a radiographic cervical spine checkup.
N Am Spine Soc J
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Background: Previous research on spinal alignment and postoperative outcomes after cervical and upper thoracic fixation has suggested that clinical and patient-reported outcomes are improved when certain anatomical parameters are maintained. These parameters include the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), C2 and T1 slopes, and cervical lordosis (CL). For patients with primary and metastatic tumors involving the subaxial cervical and/or upper thoracic spine, there is minimal guidance on how to apply these parameters.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Spine Surg
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Summary Of Background Data: The optimal surgical approach for multilevel cervical stenosis in elderly patients is controversial because of the risk of life-threatening complication.
Objective: To compare life-threatening early complication rates between ≥3 levels anterior and posterior cervical surgery in elderly patients.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!