The outcome of midwife-led labor in low-risk women within an obstetric referral unit.

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med

a Department of the Women , Mother and Neonate, Buzzi Mother and Child Hospital, Medical School of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan , Italy.

Published: September 2015

Objective: To analyze maternal and neonatal outcomes of midwife-led labor in low-risk women at term.

Methods: Prospective observational cohort of 1788 singleton low-risk pregnancies in spontaneous term labor, managed according to a specific midwife-led labor protocol. Primary outcomes were mode of delivery, episiotomy, 3rd-4th degree lacerations, post-partum hemorrhage (PPH), need for blood transfusions, pH and Apgar score and NICU admissions.

Results: A total 1754 low-risk women (50.3% of all deliveries) were included in the analysis. Epidural analgesia was performed in 29.8% of cases. The rate of cesarean section was 3.7%. Episiotomy was performed in 17.6% of women. PPH > 1000 ml occurred in 1.7% of cases. 3.2% and 0.3% of the cases had an Apgar score <7 and pH < 7.10, respectively, while 0.3% of the newborns were admitted to NICU. Consultant-led labor was required for emerging risk factors during 1st and 2nd stage of labor in 16.1 and 8.6% of cases, respectively. Although maternal outcome were worse in women with emerging risk factors in labor, while neonatal outcomes were not affected by the presence these complications.

Conclusions: In hospital settings, midwife-led labor in low-risk women might unfold its major advantages without additional risks of medicalization for the mother and the neonate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2014.958995DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

midwife-led labor
12
low-risk women
12
labor low-risk
8
apgar score
8
outcome midwife-led
4
labor
4
low-risk
4
women
4
women obstetric
4
obstetric referral
4

Similar Publications

Background: Globally, the quality of maternal and newborn care remains inadequate, as seen through indicators like perineal injuries and low Apgar scores. While midwifery practices have the potential to improve care quality and health outcomes, there is a lack of evidence on how midwife-led initiatives, particularly those aimed at improving the use of dynamic birth positions, intrapartum support, and perineal protection, affect these outcomes.

Objective: To explore how the use of dynamic birth positions, intrapartum support, and perineal protection impact the incidence of perineal injuries and the 5-min Apgar score within the context of a midwife-led quality improvement intervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In Bangladesh, Midwife Led Birthing Centres (MLBCs) have been established to provide midwifery care and sexual and reproductive health services for the displaced Rohingya population in Cox's Bazar. The aim of this study was to explore MLBCs in this humanitarian context from the perspectives of women, midwives, and other key stakeholders. A mixed-method case study was conducted at one of the MLBCs within the Rohingya refugee camps in Cox's Bazar.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate pain management techniques used during labor by analyzing medical records and conducting interviews with new mothers.
  • Findings revealed that non-pharmacological methods were more prevalent, with 61.86% in an Obstetric Center and 82.51% in a midwife-led unit, effectively reducing severe pain levels significantly.
  • The use of pharmacological pain relief was much lower (15.81%) and did not lead to better pain outcomes, suggesting a need for improved strategies that align with women's preferences during labor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The relationship between ethnicity and place of birth in England: a mixed-methods study.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

November 2024

School of Health and Psychological Sciences, City, University of London, London, EC1V 0HB, England.

Background: UK maternity policy advocates a choice of birthplace in an obstetric-led unit (OU), a midwife-led unit (MLU) or at home. Although robust evidence supports the safety of birth in midwife-led settings, particularly for women with uncomplicated pregnancies, most births are in the OU. Women and babies from ethnic minority communities experience major health disparities and inequitable care, but there is limited research examining birthplace choices through an ethnicity lens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Midwife-Led Versus Obstetrician-Led Perinatal Care for Low-Risk Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1.4 Million Pregnancies.

J Clin Med

November 2024

Department of Family and Community Medicine and Medical Education, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah 42353, Saudi Arabia.

The optimum model of perinatal care for low-risk pregnancies has been a topic of debate. Obstetrician-led care tends to perform unnecessary interventions, whereas the quality of midwife-led care has been subject to debate. This review aimed to assess whether midwife-led care reduces childbirth intervention and whether this comes at the expense of maternal and neonatal wellbeing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!