Background: Defensive medicine represents one cause of economic losses in healthcare. Studies that measured its cost have produced conflicting results.
Objective: To directly measure the proportion of primary care costs attributable to defensive medicine.
Research Design And Methods: Six-week prospective study of primary care physicians from four outpatient practices. On 3 distinct days, participants were asked to rate each order placed the day before on the extent to which it represented defensive medicine, using a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all defensive) to 4 (entirely defensive).
Main Outcome Measures: This study calculated the order defensiveness score for each order (the defensiveness/4) and the physician defensive score (the mean of all orders defensiveness scores). Each order was assigned a weighted cost by multiplying the total cost of that order (based on Medicare reimbursement rates) by the order defensiveness score. The proportion of total cost attributable to defensive medicine was calculated by dividing the weighted cost of defensive orders by the total cost of all orders.
Results: Of 50 eligible physicians, 23 agreed to participate; 21 returned the surveys and rated 1234 individual orders on 347 patients. Physicians wrote an average of 3.6 ± 1.0 orders/visit with an associated total cost of $72.60 ± 18.5 per order. Across physicians, the median physician defensive score was 0.018 (IQR = [0.008, 0.049]) and the proportion of costs attributable to defensive medicine was 3.1% (IQR = [0.5%, 7.2%]). Physicians with defensive scores above vs below the median had a similar number of orders and total costs per visit. Physicians were more likely to place defensive orders if trained in community hospitals vs academic centers (OR = 4.29; 95% CI = 1.55-11.86; p = 0.01).
Conclusions: This study describes a new method to directly quantify the cost of defensive medicine. Defensive medicine appears to have minimal impact on primary care costs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2014.959125 | DOI Listing |
QJM
January 2025
Director of the Health Department-International School of Maxiemergiences (MEDIS), Modena, Italy Member of the American College of the Emergency Phisicians.
eNeuro
January 2025
Neuronal Circuits and Behavior Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224-6823, U.S.A.
The anterior hypothalamic area (AHA) is a key brain region for orchestrating defensive behaviors. Using in vivo calcium imaging in mice, we observed that AHA neuronal activity increases during foot shock delivery and foot-shock associated auditory cues. We found that following shock-induced increases in AHA activity, a decrease in activity coincides with the onset of grooming behavior.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS Biol
January 2025
Lendület Laboratory of Thalamus Research, HUN-REN Institute of Experimental Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.
A single exposure to a stressful event can result in enduring changes in behaviour. Long-term modifications in neuronal networks induced by stress are well explored but the initial steps leading to these alterations remain incompletely understood. In this study, we found that acute stress exposure triggers an immediate increase in the firing activity of calretinin-positive neurons in the paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PVT/CR+) that persists for several days in mice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Health services institutes worldwide are trying to reduce defensive medical practice to limit its negative impact on patient care. We evaluated the factors associated with this defensive medical practice among medical professionals in the United Arab Emirates. This study deployed multivariate logistic regression analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Periodontal Res
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Aim: To investigate additional factors contributing to the pathophysiology of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis and periodontitis beyond the systemic immune suppression caused by the chemotherapeutic agent 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU).
Methods: 5-Fluorouracil was topically delivered to the non-keratinized, rapidly proliferating junctional epithelium (JE) surrounding the dentition, and acts as an immunologic and functional barrier to bacterial ingression. Various techniques, including EdU incorporation, quantitative immunohistochemistry (qIHC), histology, enzymatic activity assays, and micro-computed tomographic (μCT) imaging, were employed to analyze the JE at multiple time points following topical 5-FU treatment.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!