A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[In vitro combined effects of double antibacterial drugs against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates: comparison among combinations of colistin, arbekacin, aztreonam, rifampicin and piperacillin]. | LitMetric

This in vitro study examined the combined effects of double antibacterial drugs against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRP). The tested clinical isolates from Hiroshima University Hospital were 40 strains which met the criteria for MDRP, that is, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was > or = 16 microg/mL of meropenem, > or = 4 microg/mL of ciprofloxacin and > or = 32 microg/mL of amikacin. Using the original checkerboard plates for colistin (CL), arbekacin (ABK), aztreonam (AZT), rifampicin (RFP) and piperacillin (PIPC), MIC values were determined for single and double combinations. Based on the MIC values, fractional inhibitory concentration index values were calculated and the combined effects (synergy action or additive action) were evaluated. The three strongest drugs among the tested combinations were i) CL + RFP (synergy, 80.0%; additive, 17.5%), ii) RFP + ABK (synergy, 7.5%; additive, 70.0%) and iii) RFP + AZT (synergy, 5.0%; additive, 77.5%). In these cases, the arithmetic mean MIC value of each drug significantly decreased as follows: i) 1.38 microg/mL (alone) and 0.26 microg/mL (with RFP) for CL, 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 1.85 microg/mL (with CL) for RFP; ii) 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 7.53 microg/mL (with ABK) for RFP, 8.87 microg/mL (alone) and 2.79 microg/mL (with RFP) for ABK; iii) 19.85 microg/mL (alone) and 10.15 microg/mL (with AZT) for RFP, 28.3 microg/ mL (alone) and 6.65 microg/mL (with RFP) for AZT. Of 40 strains, metallo-beta-lactamase and aminoglycoside 6'-N-acetyltransferase were found in 20 and 37 strains, respectively; however, no significant influence of these factors was observed on the combined effects of i), ii) and iii). The results of this study provide an in vitro rationale for RFP plus CL, ABK or AZT as an effective combination therapy for MDRP infections, although the results should be verified and compared with other antibacterial drugs in further studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

combined effects
16
microg/ml rfp
16
microg/ml
14
antibacterial drugs
12
rfp abk
12
1985 microg/ml
12
rfp
11
effects double
8
double antibacterial
8
drugs multidrug-resistant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!