Providing more than health care: the dynamics of humanitarian surgery efforts on the local microeconomy.

J Craniofac Surg

From the *Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, and †Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; ‡University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska; §Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; ∥Operation Smile, Virginia Beach, Virginia; ¶Center for Surgery and Public Health, and #Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Published: September 2014

Humanitarian cleft surgery has long been provided by teams from resource-rich countries traveling for short-term missions to resource-poor countries. After identifying an area of durable unmet need through surgical missions, Operation Smile constructed a permanent center for cleft care in Northeast India. The Operation Smile Guwahati Comprehensive Cleft Care Center (GCCCC) uses a high-volume subspecialized institution to provide safe, quality, comprehensive, and cost-effective cleft care to a highly vulnerable patient population in Assam, India. The purpose of this study was to profile the expenses of several cleft missions carried out in Assam and to compare these to the expenditures of the permanent comprehensive cleft care center. We reviewed financial data from 4 Operation Smile missions in Assam between December 2009 and February 2011 and from the GCCCC for the 2012-2013 fiscal year. Expenses from the 2 models were categorized and compared. In the studied period, 33% of the mission expenses were spent locally compared to 94% of those of the center. The largest expenses in the mission model were air travel (48.8%) and hotel expenses (21.6%) for the team, whereas salaries (46.3%) and infrastructure costs (19.8%) made up the largest fractions of expenses in the center model. The evolution from mission-based care to a specialty hospital model in Guwahati incorporated a transition from vertical inputs to investments in infrastructure and human capital to create a sustainable local care delivery system.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001133DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cleft care
16
operation smile
12
comprehensive cleft
8
care center
8
care
7
cleft
6
expenses
6
center
5
providing health
4
health care
4

Similar Publications

Background: Cleft lip and/or palate is the most common congenital orofacial deformity, affecting 1/800 births. A thorough review of the literature has shown that children with cleft have poorer oral hygiene and dental health than other children, with higher levels of caries in both temporary and permanent teeth and poorer periodontal health. Cleft patients are treated by a multidisciplinary team that aims to provide comprehensive care from pre- or post-natal diagnosis to early adulthood and the end of growth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Evaluate predictors for attendance and adherence to speech evaluations and determine factors that influence longitudinal care for patients with cleft palate and craniofacial differences. Retrospective, observational cohort study. Tertiary children's hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study compares mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and tracheostomy in managing severe airway obstruction in patients with the Pierre Robin sequence (PRS).

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Literature searches were conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, E.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does Palatoplasty Technique Impact Resolution of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction?

Cleft Palate Craniofac J

January 2025

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Objective: To determine whether palatoplasty technique affects the resolution of eustachian tube dysfunction and postoperative speech outcomes in children with cleft palate (CP).

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: Multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial clinic at a tertiary care center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The decision to undertake rhinoplasty maneuvers during cleft lip repair remains controversial. Little data compare long-term outcomes with and without primary rhinoplasty (PR). This study compared nasolabial outcomes in cohorts with unilateral cleft lip (UCL) treated with and without PR at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia using standardized aesthetic and anthropometric assessments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!