Among the laboratory tests available for the follow-up of lead-exposed workers, the EDTA mobilization test is presently underestimated in the diagnosis of lead intoxication. The authors present the results of regression comparison between the urinary lead excretion 3 h (PbU 3) or 6 h (PbU 6) after EDTA injection and blood lead (PbB), urinary aminolaevulinic acid (ALAU) and urinary lead (PbU). The results were collected from 133 medical examinations of workers exposed to lead, who put in a claim for compensation to the 'Fund of Occupational Diseases' in Belgium. On the basis of the regression curves, PbU 3 and PbU 6 limit values are calculated for different cut-off values of PbB in excessive lead absorption and lead intoxication. For each of these values the 'sensitivity', 'specificity' and 'validity' are calculated. As a result the authors still consider the EDTA mobilization test as a valuable parameter in the diagnosis of lead absorption.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/39.4.136DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mobilization test
12
lead absorption
12
lead
9
edta mobilization
8
diagnosis lead
8
lead intoxication
8
urinary lead
8
pbu pbu
8
pbu
5
diagnostic sodium
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!