AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed 1047 patients under 40 who underwent surgery for subaortic stenosis between 2000-2013, noting complex stenosis (CS) in 46.2% of cases due to additional heart conditions.
  • 30-day mortality rates were low, but factors like being under 1 year old and having mitral valve issues increased early death risks; long-term survival was significantly lower for those with CS.
  • Patients with simple stenosis (SS) had better outcomes compared to those with CS, with reintervention rates also differing; findings suggest that young patients with multiple heart issues face higher risks, indicating a need for further research.

Article Abstract

Objective: To identify the outcomes of surgically treated subaortic stenosis in a national population.

Methods: From 2000 to 2013, 1047 patients aged < 40 years underwent 1142 subaortic stenosis procedures. Of the 1047 patients, 484 (46.2%) were considered to have complex stenosis (CS) because at or before the first operation they had mitral valve (MV) disease, aortic valve disease, aortic coarctation or an interrupted aortic arch.

Results: The 30-day mortality was 0.7% for simple stenosis (SS), 2.3% for CS (P = .06), and 1.6% overall. Age < 1 year (P < .01), MV procedure (P = .02) and an interrupted aortic arch at the index procedure (P < .01) were risk factors for early death. Konno-type procedure early mortality was 2.4%. The 12-year survival was 97.1%, with a significant difference between SS and CS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.53; P = .02). Having MV disease alone (HR, 4.11; P = .02), MV disease plus aortic coarctation (HR, 6.73; P = .008), and age < 1 year (HR, 6.72; P < .001) were risk factors for late mortality. Freedom from subaortic reintervention overall was 92.3% and 88.5% at 5 and 12 years, respectively, much greater with CS than with SS (HR, 4.91; P < .0001). The independent risk factors for reintervention were younger age at the index procedure (HR, 0.1/y; P = .002), concomitant MV procedure (HR, 2.68; P = .019), ventricular septal defect plus interrupted aortic arch (HR, 3.19; P = .014), and ventricular septal defect plus aortic coarctation (HR, 2.41; P = .023). Undergoing a concomitant aortic valve procedure at the index procedure was protective (HR, 0.29; P = .025).

Conclusions: Patients with SS had excellent outcomes. However, those with CS had worse long-term survival and freedom from reintervention, with morbidity and mortality greatest in young patients with multiple lesions. Additional evaluation in large-scale prospective studies is warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.091DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subaortic stenosis
12
disease aortic
12
aortic coarctation
12
interrupted aortic
12
risk factors
12
1047 patients
8
valve disease
8
aortic
8
aortic valve
8
age year
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!