Aim: To determine the miss rate for colorectal flat adenomas during colonoscopy and the risk factors.
Methods: Flat adenomas are frequently missed during colonoscopy. However, the risk factors that influence their miss rates are unclear. This was a multicenter, retrospective study in which patients diagnosed with colorectal adenomas at a diagnostic colonoscopy and followed within 3 mo by a second therapeutic colonoscopy were pooled out from the established database. The "per-patient" and "per-adenoma" adenoma miss rates (AMR) for overall adenomas and flat adenomas, and patient-, adenoma-, and procedure-related risk factors potentially associated with the "per-adenoma" AMR for flat adenomas were determined.
Results: Chromoscopy and high-definition colonoscopy were not taken under consideration in the study. Among 2093 patients with colorectal adenomas, 691 (33.0%) were diagnosed with flat adenomas, 514 with concomitant protruding adenomas and 177 without. The "per-patient" AMR for flat adenomas was 43.3% (299/691); the rates were 54.3% and 11.3%, respectively, for those with protruding adenomas and those without (OR = 9.320, 95%CI: 5.672-15.314, χ (2) = 99.084, P < 0.001). The "per-adenoma" AMR for flat adenomas was 44.3% (406/916). In multivariate analysis, older age, presence of concomitant protruding adenomas, poor bowel preparation, smaller adenoma size, location at the right colon, insufficient experience of the colonoscopist, and withdrawal time < 6 min were associated with an increased "per-adenoma" AMR for flat adenomas. The AMR for flat adenomas was moderately correlated with that for overall adenomas (r = 0.516, P < 0.0001). The AMR for flat adenomas during colonoscopy was high.
Conclusion: Patient's age, concomitant protruding adenomas, bowel preparation, size and location of adenomas, proficiency of the colonoscopist, and withdrawal time are factors affecting the "per-adenoma" AMR for flat adenomas.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138473 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10927 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Significant Missed Polyps in the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP): A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Contributing Factors.
Cureus
October 2024
Gastroenterology, Macclesfield District General Hospital, Macclesfield, GBR.
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant public health challenge. Patients having abnormal faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results are offered a colonoscopy. The effectiveness of colonoscopies can, however, often be challenged by the occurrence of missed polyps.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurgical outcomes from robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: a case series on experience in a large tertiary referral centre.
Surg Endosc
November 2024
Endocrine and General Surgery Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is gaining wider acceptance in most surgical specialties. However, in the United Kingdom, endocrine surgery has not fully adopted robotics. This paper aims to present the early experience and outcomes of patients who underwent robotic-assisted adrenalectomy at a tertiary referral endocrine surgery department.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEndoscopic features of rectal mucosal prolapse syndrome (RMPS): Differentiation from malignant rectal tumor.
Endosc Int Open
November 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Article Synopsis
- - Rectal mucosal prolapse syndrome (RMPS) often presents with symptoms like rectal bleeding and can be mistaken for malignant rectal tumors (MRT) during endoscopic exams; this study aimed to differentiate between the two and examine RMPS characteristics.
- - A total of 826 patients were analyzed, revealing that RMPS patients were younger, had smaller lesions, and a longer clinical course compared to those with MRT.
- - Five distinct morphological phenotypes of RMPS lesions were identified, with gender differences noted in lesion types; key features like age, lesion size, and clinical duration can help differentiate RMPS from MRT.
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Nonampullary Duodenal Lesions: Expert Review.
Gastroenterology
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Description: Nonampullary duodenal polyps are found in up to 5% of all upper endoscopies; the vast majority are identified incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Although most are benign, adenomas are estimated to account for 10%-20% of these lesions. Most international guidelines recommend that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection; this may be associated with a near 15% adverse event rate (predominantly bleeding and perforation) in prospective studies, with substantial local recurrence on surveillance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAn evaluation of trends for mesothelioma mortality in American women: Addressing the content of a recent Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).
Toxicol Ind Health
January 2025
Paustenbach and Associates, Jackson, WY, USA.
Mesothelioma is a fatal disease that has historically been associated with exposure to airborne asbestos. Because occupational asbestos exposures dropped dramatically in the late 1960s and early 1970s, far fewer cases of mesothelioma today are due to these fibers but, instead, are usually a result of the aging process or genetic predisposition. In May of 2022, a Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) was issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) regarding malignant mesothelioma incidence in women from 1999 to 2020.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!