A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Family forest landowners' interest in forest carbon offset programs: focus group findings from the lake States, USA. | LitMetric

Family forest landowners' interest in forest carbon offset programs: focus group findings from the lake States, USA.

Environ Manage

Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, 115 Green Hall, 1530 Cleveland Ave. N, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA,

Published: December 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • In 2012, focus groups gathered landowners with 20+ acres in the Lake States (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin) to discuss forest carbon offsetting issues, following a prior survey in 2010.
  • Participants found that current payment rates for carbon credits are insufficient to motivate landowner participation in carbon markets, with more focus on additional benefits like better tree species, wildlife, and trails.
  • Landowners' perceptions of their forest's condition significantly influenced their interest in carbon management, particularly those feeling their forests were in poor condition, with many expressing interest in using carbon management to lower property taxes.

Article Abstract

In 2012, focus groups were organized with individuals owning 20+ acres in the Lake States region of the United States (Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin) to discuss various issues related to forest carbon offsetting. Focus group participants consisted of landowners who had responded to an earlier mail-back survey (2010) on forest carbon offsets. Two focus groups were held per state with an average of eight participants each (49 total). While landowner participant types varied, overall convergence was reached on several key issues. In general, discussion results found that the current payment amounts offered for carbon credits are not likely, on their own, to encourage participation in carbon markets. Landowners are most interested in other benefits they can attain through carbon management (e.g., improved stand species mix, wildlife, and trails). Interestingly, landowner perceptions about the condition of their own forest land were most indicative of prospective interest in carbon management. Landowners who felt that their forest was currently in poor condition, or did not meet their forest ownership objectives, were most interested in participating. While the initial survey sought landowner opinions about carbon markets, a majority of focus group participants expressed interest in general carbon management as a means to achieve reduced property taxes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0352-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forest carbon
12
focus group
12
carbon management
12
carbon
9
lake states
8
focus groups
8
group participants
8
carbon markets
8
forest
6
focus
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!