Objectives: The Pfannenstiel incision is not a very common approach for radical retropubic prostatectomy (RPE). This study is primarily dealing with the approach to the prostate.
Material And Methods: A 10-12 cm Pfannenstiel incision was made 2 fingers above the pubic bone. The rectus sheath was opened transversally and dissected from the rectus muscle. The muscle was further on divided in the midline; otherwise, the operation was performed the same way as the retropubic radical prostatectomy described by Walsh [1]. The wound closure was performed in several layers, and the skin was stapled.
Results: In a series of 163 RPEs, we achieved excellent cosmetic results. Four patients developed subcutaneous hematomas, two of them required surgical intervention, and 3 patients developed infections that were effectively treated with antibiotics.
Conclusions: Our experience with the Pfannenstiel incision approach for radical retropubic prostatectomy was very positive. The approach provides good exposure, heals well with a cosmetic scar, and facilitates hernia repair through the same approach if needed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4132592 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2014.02.art6 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!