Objective: Evaluate the prevalence of atypical femoral fracture (AFF) in Thai patients at a single institution based on the 2010 and 2013 American Society of Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria and the sensitivity and specificity of each radiographic feature of AFF to identify bisphosphonate treatment.
Material And Method: The authors retrospectively reviewed plain radiographs of 856 patients who were diagnosed with subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures between 2002 and 2013. Only those who had major radiographic features of AFF according to the 2010 ASBMR criteria were included. Next, the prevalence of atypical fracture was recalculated based on the revised 2013 ASBMR criteria. Furthermore, the specificity and sensitivity of each radiological finding to detect bisphosphonate treatment were calculated.
Results: The prevalence of atypical femoral fracture based on 2010 ASBMR criteria at this institution was 5.7%. Two patients had all radiographic features of AFF but sustained a high-energy trauma and could be diagnosed with AFF based on the 2013 ASBMR criteria. Among all of the radiographic features to define AFF, a localized periosteal thickening of the lateral femoral cortex was the most specific sign to detect bisphosphonate treatment (0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99).
Conclusion: The prevalence of AFF in Thai patients at a single institution was approximately 6%. Although the prevalence of AFF did not dramatically change after applying the 2013 revised ASBMR criteria, this reflected some gap in the diagnosis criteria, which should require further refinement. The authors suggested that the ASBMR criteria should be used only with those having acute fractures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Bone Miner Res
December 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
Orthop Surg
October 2024
Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Objective: The exact relationship among atypical periprosthetic femoral fractures (APFFs), typical periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs), and atypical femur fractures (AFFs) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of APFFs among PFFs and to identify the clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis that distinguish APFFs from typical PFFs and AFFs to further determine the relationship among these three fracture types.
Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical data of 117 consecutive patients who had PFFs after hip arthroplasty between January 2012 and December 2022 and further classified them into an APFF group and a typical PFF group according to the revised ASBMR diagnostic criteria for AFF.
JBMR Plus
August 2024
Office of Innovation and Transformation, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
This retrospective study investigates the prevalence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) among patients admitted with hip and shaft fractures at a tertiary referral center in Beirut, Lebanon. We analyzed electronic medical records and radiology studies of patients aged above 40 admitted with hip and shaft fractures between January 2006 and December 2019. Fractures were confirmed by ICD9 or ICD10 codes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Bone Joint Surg Am
February 2024
Division of Orthopedic Trauma Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.
Background: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate differences in demographic features and clinical outcomes between patients who sustained a typical versus atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture.
Methods: We reviewed the records for a cohort of consecutive patients who had undergone operative treatment of a subtrochanteric femoral fracture. Fractures were classified as either "typical" or "atypical" on the basis of the criteria of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
J Bone Miner Res
November 2023
Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Australia.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!