AI Article Synopsis

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a serious condition with high mortality rates; this study examined the outcomes of AAA repairs in the Department of Defense from 2006 to 2011.* -
  • A total of 632 patients had surgical repairs, with the majority undergoing endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), which showed lower 30-day mortality compared to open aortic repair (OAR), but the long-term survival rates were similar.* -
  • Overall, while EVAR had better immediate outcomes, there was no significant difference in complications like stroke and heart issues between EVAR and OAR in both the short and long term.*

Article Abstract

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is common with unacceptably high rates of mortality and morbidity with unknown rates of complications after repair in the Department of Defense (DoD).

Methods: All patients treated at a DOD or VA clinic or medical facility with a diagnosis of AAA identified by ICD-9 code search were identified by Patient Administration Systems and Biostatistics Activity (PASBA) using the Standard Inpatient Data Record (SIDR) and Composite Ambulatory Patient Encounter Record (CAPER) from January 2006 till December 2011. The primary outcome was death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiac arrhythmia between subjects who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open aortic repair (OAR).

Results: A total of 8314 patients were screened to identify 632 patients who underwent surgical repair of non-ruptured AAA. EVAR was performed in 497 patients (78.6%) and OAR in 135 patients (21.4%). Mortality at 30 days was less common in EVAR patients (1.6% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.004), but was not sustained (16.9% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.797). Mean survival free from mortality was not different between the two groups (EVAR vs. OAR: 6.14 ± 0.13 years vs. 6.11 ± 0.22 years, p = 0.378). The composite endpoint of MI, stroke, arrhythmia, or death was not different between groups at 30 days (EVAR vs. OAR: 12.9% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.774) or in long-term follow-up population (EVAR vs. OAR: 40.6% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.073) though there was a trend toward higher event rates in the EVAR. The composite endpoint of MI, stroke, and arrhythmia occurred in 198 patients (31%).

Conclusion: EVAR was associated with lower 30-day mortality rates; however, this benefit was not sustained in longer-term follow-up. There is no difference in the rates of stroke, myocardial infarction, or cardiac arrhythmia at 30 days or in long-term follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1708538114546207DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evar oar
12
abdominal aortic
8
aortic aneurysm
8
patients
8
632 patients
8
department defense
8
myocardial infarction
8
cardiac arrhythmia
8
aortic repair
8
evar
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!