Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Two pulsed thermoelectrically cooled mid-infrared distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers (QCLs) were used for the quasi-simultaneous in-line determination of NO and NO2 at the caloric power plant Dürnrohr (Austria). The QCL beams were combined using a bifurcated hollow fiber, sent through the flue tube (inside diameter: 5.5 m), reflected by a retro-reflector and recorded using a fast thermoelectrically cooled mercury-cadmium-telluride detector. The thermal chirp during 300 ns pulses was about 1.2 cm(-1) and allowed scanning of rotational vibrational doublets of the analytes. On the basis of the thermal chirp and the temporal resolution of data acquisition, a spectral resolution of approximately 0.02 cm(-1) was achieved. The recorded rotational vibrational absorption lines were centered at 1900 cm(-1) for NO and 1630 cm(-1) for NO2. Despite water content in the range of 152-235 g/m(3) and an average particle load of 15.8 mg/m(3) in the flue gas, in-line measurements were possible achieving limits of detection of 73 ppb for NO and 91 ppb for NO2 while optimizing for a single analyte. Quasi-simultaneous measurements resulted in limits of detection of 219 ppb for NO and 164 ppb for NO2, respectively. Influences of temperature and pressure on the data evaluation are discussed, and results are compared to an established reference method based on the extractive measurements presented.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac5020244 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!