Cross-linguistic studies have shown that typically developing children have difficulties comprehending non-canonical structures. These findings have been interpreted within the Relativized Minimality (RM) approach, according to which local relations cannot be established between two terms of a dependency if an intervening element possesses similar morphosyntactic features. In an extension of RM, Friedmann, Belletti, and Rizzi (2009) suggested that lexical NP restriction is the source of minimality effects in non-canonical sentences. The present study aimed at investigating whether the predictions of their account can be confirmed in Greek. Our results indicate that although lexical NP restriction is a crucial factor in generating minimality effects, it is not always sufficient to account for the comprehension difficulties that young children face with non-canonical sentences, since the internal structure (i.e. the feature specification) of the moved element and of the intervener affects their performance, as well.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000257 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The Acquisition of Relative Clauses in Autism: The Role of Executive Functions and Language.
J Autism Dev Disord
December 2024
Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Philology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Purpose: Relative clauses present a well-known processing asymmetry between object-extracted and subject-extracted dependencies across both typical and atypical populations. The present study aimed at exploring the comprehension of object and subject relative clauses as conceptualized by the Relativized Minimality framework in autistic children and in a group of age- and IQ-matched typically-developing children. The study also explored the way performance in relative clauses would be affected by the children's language and executive function skills.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAssessing Intervention Effects in Sentence Processing: Object Relatives vs. Subject Control.
Front Psychol
February 2021
Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa, Departmento de Linguística Geral e Românica, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Object relative clauses are harder to process than subject relative clauses. Under Grillo's (2009) Generalized Minimality framework, complexity effects of object relatives are construed as intervention effects, which result from an interaction between locality constraints on movement (Relativized Minimality) and the sentence processing system. Specifically, intervention of the subject DP in the movement dependency is expected to generate a minimality violation whenever processing limitations render the moved object underspecified, resulting in compromised comprehension.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChild Relativized Minimality and Grammaticality Judgement.
Front Psychol
February 2020
Departament de Filologia Catalana, Centre de Lingüística Teòrica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Grammaticality judgements are the fundamental experimental source of generative linguistic theory. They may be difficult to elicit, especially in some populations, but generally they inform us neatly about what the grammar licenses or, on the contrary, bans. On the other hand, acceptability is multifactorial and therefore, unlike grammaticality judgement, can be quantified.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChinese Children's Knowledge of Topicalization: Experimental Evidence from a Comprehension Study.
J Psycholinguist Res
December 2018
Departament de Filologia Catalana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
There is a debate as to whether topic structures in Chinese involve A'-movement or result from base-generation of the topic in the left periphery. If Chinese topicalization was derived by movement, under the assumptions of Friedmann et al.'s Relativized Minimality (Lingua 119:67-88, 2009), we would expect children's comprehension of object topicalization (with OSV order) to be worse than their comprehension of subject topicalization (with SVO order).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInternal Grammar and Children's Grammatical Creativity against Poor Inputs.
Front Psychol
December 2017
Département de Linguistique, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
This article is about the unexpected linguistic behavior that young children sometimes display by producing structures that are only marginally present in the adult language in a constrained way, and that adults do not adopt in the same experimental conditions. It is argued here that children's capacity to overextend the use of given syntactic structures thereby resulting in a grammatical creative behavior is the sign of an internal grammatical pressure which manifests itself given appropriate discourse conditions and factors of grammatical complexity and which does not necessarily require a rich input to be put into work. This poverty of the stimulus type situation is illustrated here through the overextended use of -Topics and reflexive-causative passives by young Italian speaking children when answering eliciting questions concerning the direct object of the clause.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!