A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Lung function, maximum and submaximum exercise testing in COPD patients: reproducibility over a long interval. | LitMetric

This study was designed to investigate the reproducibility and clinical relevance of several lung function and exercise test indices in a sample of patients with stable severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Twenty subjects (ages 67.8 +/- 2.0 years, forced expiratory volume in 1s, [FEV1] 39.7 +/- 2.8% predicted) receiving conventional medical therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation were tested 4 times at 1 month intervals. Testing procedures included lung function (inspiratory vital capacity [IVC], FEV1, plethysmographic functional residual capacity [FRC], specific conductance of the airways (sGaw), single breath transfer factor divided by the alveolar volume [TL/VA]); incremental, progressive, symptom-limited, cycle exercise (maximum work load [Wmax], maximum heart rate [HRmax], maximum ventilation [VEmax], maximum oxygen uptake [VO2max]); and 2 modes of submaximum exercise (12 min walking test [12 MWD] and endurance cycle test). The mean of the absolute value of the individual patient, session-to-session, variation was found to be 0.131 for FEV1, 102 ml/min for VO2max. The within-subject variability was the smallest for HRmax and IVC (mean intrasubject coefficient of variation, [CV intra] 5.0 and 6.5%) and the greatest for TL/VA, the work performed during the endurance cycle test (EW) and sGaw (CV intra 16.5, 19.4, and 22.7%), while it was reasonably low (8.1-10.2%) for all the other variables studied. Calculation of the F ratio of the intersubject variance to the residual (total minus intersubject) variance, interpreted as a signal-to-noise, ratio, yielded the following, in decreasing order: TL/VA, EW, VEmax, VO2max, IVC, FEV1, HRmax, Wmax, sGaw, 12 MWD, FRC. If we assume that a useful variable should combine a low within-subject variability (CV intra less than or equal to 10%) with a high signal-to-noise ratio, we conclude that, among all the variables studied, IVC, FEV1, VEmax, and VO2max are those with the greatest clinical potential for functional assessment in patients with COPD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02714953DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung function
12
submaximum exercise
8
endurance cycle
8
cycle test
8
within-subject variability
8
variables studied
8
intersubject variance
8
signal-to-noise ratio
8
vemax vo2max
8
ivc fev1
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!