Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Context: Osteoporotic fracture risk is highly heritable, but genome-wide association studies have explained only a small proportion of the heritability to date. Genetic data may improve prediction of fracture risk in osteopenic subjects and assist early intervention and management.
Objective: To detect common and rare variants in coding and regulatory regions related to osteoporosis-related traits, and to investigate whether genetic profiling improves the prediction of fracture risk.
Design And Setting: This cross-sectional study was conducted in three clinical units in Korea.
Participants: Postmenopausal women with extreme phenotypes (n = 982) were used for the discovery set, and 3895 participants were used for the replication set.
Main Outcome Measure: We performed targeted resequencing of 198 genes. Genetic risk scores from common variants (GRS-C) and from common and rare variants (GRS-T) were calculated.
Results: Nineteen common variants in 17 genes (of the discovered 34 functional variants in 26 genes) and 31 rare variants in five genes (of the discovered 87 functional variants in 15 genes) were associated with one or more osteoporosis-related traits. Accuracy of fracture risk classification was improved in the osteopenic patients by adding GRS-C to fracture risk assessment models (6.8%; P < .001) and was further improved by adding GRS-T (9.6%; P < .001). GRS-C improved classification accuracy for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures by 7.3% (P = .005) and 3.0% (P = .091), and GRS-T further improved accuracy by 10.2% (P < .001) and 4.9% (P = .008), respectively.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that both common and rare functional variants may contribute to osteoporotic fracture and that adding genetic profiling data to current models could improve the prediction of fracture risk in an osteopenic individual.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1584 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!