Background: Preventing and managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain important goals. The objective of the Pan Australasian chemotherapy-induced emesis burden of illness (PrACTICE) study was to describe the incidence of CINV after highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer in current clinical practice in Australia and five Asian countries (China, India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan).

Study Design: This prospective, observational study of CINV was conducted at 31 sites in these six countries from August 2011 through September 2012 and enrolled male and female adult patients (≥18 years of age) naïve to HEC and MEC who were scheduled to receive at least two cycles of single-day chemotherapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete response, defined as no vomiting or use of rescue therapy, during chemotherapy cycle 1 in the overall phase (0-120 h), acute phase (0-24 h), and delayed phase (>24-120 h). Study outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Primary outcomes, CINV incidence, and treatment patterns (chemotherapy, CINV prophylaxis, rescue medication prescription, and rescue medication use) were assessed by phase (overall, acute, delayed), by cycle (as appropriate), within and across countries, and by level of chemotherapy emetogenicity (HEC vs. MEC). The impact of CINV in cycle 1 on CINV in cycle 2 was analyzed for all patients with evaluable data for cycle 2. No site-specific analyses were performed. The remainder of this special series of papers reports on the results of this study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2374-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hec mec
12
pan australasian
8
australasian chemotherapy-induced
8
chemotherapy-induced emesis
8
emesis burden
8
burden illness
8
rescue medication
8
cinv cycle
8
cinv
7
study
5

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The review analyzes the effectiveness of new antiemetic medications versus traditional ones for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • It finds that novel agents like netupitant/palonosetron and olanzapine are at least as effective, if not better, than standard antiemetic treatments that use aprepitant and other agents.
  • The study calls for more direct comparisons and larger trials to further understand the benefits of these new therapies in everyday clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare multiple antiemetic treatments, analyzing data from 16 randomized controlled trials involving over 3,000 patients.
  • * Results indicate that NK1 antagonists combined with ondansetron are the most effective option for preventing CINV in children, particularly when given with dexamethasone, while olanzapine also shows significant benefits when added to certain regimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study examines the effectiveness of a combination treatment of Generic Netupitant and Palonosetron (Nykron) with dexamethasone in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • It assesses outcomes like complete response and complete control of nausea/vomiting during both the acute (0-24 hours) and delayed (24-120 hours) phases after chemotherapy, gathering data from 372 cancer patients primarily diagnosed with breast or gastrointestinal cancers.
  • Results indicate a high success rate for the regimen, with an overall response of 96.9%, suggesting it is an effective option for managing CINV while potentially reducing the need for higher
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Over the past decade, several randomized controlled trials have compared single-day dexamethasone (dexamethasone-sparing) regimens to the current standard multi-day dexamethasone antiemetic regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing regimens to standard multi-day dexamethasone, used for the prophylaxis of CINV.

Methods: Ovid Medline and Embase were searched from database inception to March 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Fosnetupitant is an anti-nausea medication used for patients undergoing chemotherapy, showing non-inferiority to another treatment in prior studies.
  • A phase II study evaluated the safety of a faster 15-minute infusion of fosnetupitant in cancer patients, focusing on allergic reaction incidents and other side effects.
  • Results indicated that the 15-minute infusion was safe, with no allergic reactions or severe side effects reported, and a high complete response rate of 87%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!