Background: Preventing and managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remain important goals. The objective of the Pan Australasian chemotherapy-induced emesis burden of illness (PrACTICE) study was to describe the incidence of CINV after highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC) for cancer in current clinical practice in Australia and five Asian countries (China, India, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan).
Study Design: This prospective, observational study of CINV was conducted at 31 sites in these six countries from August 2011 through September 2012 and enrolled male and female adult patients (≥18 years of age) naïve to HEC and MEC who were scheduled to receive at least two cycles of single-day chemotherapy. The primary effectiveness endpoint was complete response, defined as no vomiting or use of rescue therapy, during chemotherapy cycle 1 in the overall phase (0-120 h), acute phase (0-24 h), and delayed phase (>24-120 h). Study outcomes were analyzed descriptively. Primary outcomes, CINV incidence, and treatment patterns (chemotherapy, CINV prophylaxis, rescue medication prescription, and rescue medication use) were assessed by phase (overall, acute, delayed), by cycle (as appropriate), within and across countries, and by level of chemotherapy emetogenicity (HEC vs. MEC). The impact of CINV in cycle 1 on CINV in cycle 2 was analyzed for all patients with evaluable data for cycle 2. No site-specific analyses were performed. The remainder of this special series of papers reports on the results of this study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2374-1 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
October 2024
Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, PAK.
Support Care Cancer
October 2024
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Cureus
September 2024
Medical Affairs, Zydus Lifesciences Ltd., Ahmedabad, IND.
Support Care Cancer
October 2024
Genolier Cancer Center, Genolier, Switzerland.
Introduction: Over the past decade, several randomized controlled trials have compared single-day dexamethasone (dexamethasone-sparing) regimens to the current standard multi-day dexamethasone antiemetic regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone-sparing regimens to standard multi-day dexamethasone, used for the prophylaxis of CINV.
Methods: Ovid Medline and Embase were searched from database inception to March 2024.
Oncologist
September 2024
Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi 484-8681, Japan.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!