A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Remote delivery of congenital cardiac magnetic resonance imaging services: a unique telemedicine model. | LitMetric

Remote delivery of congenital cardiac magnetic resonance imaging services: a unique telemedicine model.

Pediatr Cardiol

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics and The Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd, Suite A3600, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA,

Published: January 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is becoming more important in managing congenital heart disease, but expertise to perform and interpret these scans is limited.
  • A study compared local CMRI services, where patients and physicians are on-site, with remote services, where physicians are 250 miles away.
  • Findings showed no significant difference in safety or patient outcomes between local and remote scans, indicating that remote CMRI services can be effectively implemented with existing technology.

Article Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is increasingly utilized in the management of patients with congenital heart disease. Unfortunately, the expertise to perform and interpret these studies is not universally available, despite an increasing population of congenital heart survivors. This retrospective analysis describes our experience providing on-site CMRI services compared with providing the same services over a geographic distance of 250 miles. There were 83 local scans with both physician and patient on-site compared with 91 scans controlled by a physician geographically remote from the patients. The patients were well-matched for age, sex, study duration, scan type, and history of prior cardiac intervention. There was no difference in use of deep sedation or diazepam for anxiolysis, or use of atropine for arrhythmia suppression. There were no patient safety issues and there was satisfaction on the part of the referring physicians who were able to obtain more timely studies, as well as the remote-scanning physicians who had a workflow comparable with the local scans, but no lost travel time. This experience suggests that remote delivery of cardiac MRI services for the congenital heart population is feasible and can be done with comparable success and safety to a traditional "local" model. We also suggest the configuration to provide such remote CMRI services with commercially available hardware and software.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0991-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

congenital heart
12
remote delivery
8
cardiac magnetic
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
cmri services
8
local scans
8
services
5
remote
4
congenital
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!