Background: Drug-eluting stents have been used in daily practice since 2002, with the clear advantages of reducing the risk of target vessel revascularization and an impressive reduction in restenosis rate by 50%-70%. However, the occurrence of a late thrombosis can compromise long-term results, particularly if the risks of this event were sustained. In this context, a registry of clinical cases gains special value.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in the real world.
Methods: We report on the clinical findings and 8-year follow-up parameters of all patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent from January 2002 to April 2007. Drug-eluting stents were used in accordance with the clinical and interventional cardiologist decision and availability of the stent.
Results: A total of 611 patients were included, and clinical follow-up of up to 8 years was obtained for 96.2% of the patients. Total mortality was 8.7% and nonfatal infarctions occurred in 4.3% of the cases. Target vessel revascularization occurred in 12.4% of the cases, and target lesion revascularization occurred in 8% of the cases. The rate of stent thrombosis was 2.1%. There were no new episodes of stent thrombosis after the fifth year of follow-up. Comparative subanalysis showed no outcome differences between the different types of stents used, including Cypher®, Taxus®, and Endeavor®.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that drug-eluting stents remain safe and effective at very long-term follow-up. Patients in the "real world" may benefit from drug-eluting stenting with excellent, long-term results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193064 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/abc.20140110 | DOI Listing |
J Control Release
January 2025
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, PR China. Electronic address:
Vascular stents are frequently used in interventional therapy for atherosclerotic arteries. Interventional treatment with bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents has significantly reduced mortality. Restenosis and late thrombus were also major safety concerns in stent implantation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProg Cardiovasc Dis
January 2025
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA 22909, United States of America. Electronic address:
Coronary artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) is driven by neointimal hyperplasia and neoatherosclerosis in previously placed stents. Drug eluting stents (DES) have been adopted as first line therapy for the initial episode of ISR. However, recurrent ISR has limited durable salvage options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Otol Rhinol Laryngol
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Objectives: The primary objective of this case series is to assess the effectiveness of the off-label use of the PROPEL drug-eluting stent, traditionally FDA-approved for sinus surgery, in preventing restenosis following canalplasty in patients with chronic otologic conditions or congenital anomalies. The stent provides both mechanical support to maintain canal patency and localized steroid delivery to reduce inflammation and scarring.
Methods: Four patients with various otologic conditions underwent canalplasty, followed by the placement of drug-eluting stents into the external auditory canal.
J Mol Cell Cardiol
December 2024
A.I.Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Heart Centre and Gene Therapy Unit, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. Electronic address:
Background: Coronary stenting operations have become the main option for the treatment of coronary heart disease. Vessel recovery after stenting has emerged as a critical factor in reducing possible complications. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility, safety and efficacy of locally administered intraluminal gene therapy delivered using a specialized infusion balloon catheter.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Cardiovasc Med
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, 100069 Beijing, China.
Background: Because of the limitations in new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), treatments advocating for non-stents with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) is now of great interest. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to testify whether a DCB was more effective and safer than a DES in treating de novo coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to obtain high-quality trials comparing DCB with DES for the treatment of de novo CAD.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!