Objective: In this secondary analysis of results of the Clinical Outcomes in MEasurement-Based Treatment (COMET) trial, patient behaviors that might account for the differences observed in clinical outcomes were examined.

Methods: Patients (N=914) diagnosed as having major depressive disorder participated in telephone interviews either monthly for six months (intervention) or at three and six months (usual care) asking about antidepressant medication-taking, use of psychotherapy or counseling, and participation in depression support groups. Physicians (N=83) in the intervention arm received monthly feedback regarding their patients' depression severity.

Results: A total of 664 (73%) patients completed the month 6 interview. The adjusted odds of current antidepressant use at six months were 85% greater (p=.01) for patients in the intervention (N=380) versus usual care (N=284) arms, according to multivariate regression analyses.

Conclusions: More frequent measurement of depression symptoms was associated with greater medication persistence, which in turn may have mediated clinical improvements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201300326DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical outcomes
12
outcomes measurement-based
8
measurement-based treatment
8
treatment comet
8
comet trial
8
usual care
8
depression
4
depression monitoring
4
monitoring patient
4
patient behavior
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!