Effect of Implant Diameter and Ridge Dimension on Stress Distribution in Mandibular First Molar Sites-A Photoelastic Study.

J Oral Implantol

3  Deceased; previously with Advanced Prosthodontics, Biomaterials, and Hospital Dentistry, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif.

Published: October 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines how the diameter of dental implants affects stress distribution around them, particularly in the lower jaw's first molar area.
  • Various models were created to simulate different bone conditions and implant sizes, and testing revealed that wider implants produced less stress compared to narrower ones.
  • Overall, the results suggest that using wider implants in areas with narrow ridges can lead to better stress management and potentially enhance long-term implant success.

Article Abstract

The long-term clinical success of a dental implant is dependent upon maintaining sufficient osseointegration to resist forces of occlusion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of implant diameter on stress distribution around screw-type dental implants in mandibular first molar sites using photoelastic models. The design included models with different buccal-lingual dimension. Twelve composite photoelastic models were assembled using 2 different resins to simulate trabecular and cortical bone. Half of the models were fabricated with average dimensions for ridge width and the other half with narrower buccal-lingual dimensions. One internal connection implant (13 mm length) with either a standard (4 mm), wide (5 mm), or narrow (3.3 mm) diameter was embedded in the first molar position of each photoelastic model. Half the implants were tapered and the other half were straight. Full gold crowns in the shape of a mandibular first molar were fabricated and attached to the implants. Vertical and angled loads of 15 and 30 pounds were applied to specific points on the crown. Wide-diameter implants produced the least stress in all ridges while narrow-diameter implants generated the highest stress, especially in narrow ridges. It may be that the volume and quality of bone surrounding implants influences stress distribution with a greater ratio of cortical to trabecular bone, thus providing better support. Models with wide-diameter implants loaded axially had a more symmetrical stress distribution compared to standard and narrow diameter implants. A more asymmetrical stress pattern developed along the entire implant length with angled loads. Implant diameter and ridge width had considerable influence on stress distribution. Narrow-diameter implants produced more stress than wide diameter implants in all conditions tested.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stress distribution
20
implant diameter
12
mandibular molar
12
implants
10
stress
9
diameter ridge
8
photoelastic models
8
ridge width
8
implant length
8
narrow diameter
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!