Comparing the outcomes between Chopart, Lisfranc and multiple metatarsal shaft fractures.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

Department of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, University of Muenster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, Building W1, 48149, Muenster, Germany,

Published: October 2014

Objectives: Complex midfoot injuries could lead to severe functional impairment of mobility and quality of daily living. Aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of Chopart, Lisfranc fractures and multiple metatarsal shaft fractures.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Level one trauma center.

Intervention: Open or closed reduction and internal fixation with screws, K-wires, plates, external fixation or combination of different technics.

Main Outcome Measurements: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Midfoot Score and the Maryland Foot Score were used to assess pain and functional outcome. 3D gait analysis, pedobarographic analysis and radiologic examinations were performed. The activity level was measured by a step counting accelerometer. All results were compared to an age-matched healthy control group.

Results: 24 patients with a median age of 44 years (16-72) were included: 12 patients with multiple metatarsal shaft fractures, 6 patients with Chopart and 6 patients with Lisfranc fractures. The median follow-up was 2.6 years. The pedobarographic analysis reports reduced contact time of the total foot (p = 0.08), the forefoot (p = 0.008) and the hallux (p = 0.015) for the injured foot. A median score of 64 for the SF-36, 64 for the AOFAS Midfoot Score and 73 for the Maryland Foot Score indicated a poor restoration of foot function. Multiple metatarsal shaft fractures presented a significantly lower walking speed (p = 0.03) and cadence (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: The worst results were reported for multiple metatarsal shaft fractures on outcome scores, pedobarography, gait analysis and activity. Metatarsal serial fractures should not be underestimated as well as Chopart and Lisfranc fractures.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2059-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multiple metatarsal
20
metatarsal shaft
20
shaft fractures
16
chopart lisfranc
12
outcomes chopart
8
lisfranc fractures
8
aofas midfoot
8
midfoot score
8
score maryland
8
maryland foot
8

Similar Publications

Purpose Of The Study: Lisfranc is a challenging injury both diagnostically and surgically, with sparse long-term literature evidence of surgical practice. We aim to review our long-term specialist orthopaedic institutional experience of Lisfranc injuries and the surgical management of this complex injury, specifically considering surgical outcomes as per radiological and clinical assessment.

Material And Methods: We present data from a prospectively maintained institutional database, reviewing patients who underwent operative fixation for Lisfranc injury between April 2014 and August 2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Functional reconstruction following bilateral amputation of the manus and pes in a cat with frostbite injury.

Can Vet J

January 2025

Guardian Veterinary Centre, 5620 99th Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6E 1V2 (Cormillot); VCA Canada, Guardian Veterinary Centre, 5620 99th Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6E 1V2 (Fowler).

This case report describes metacarpophalangeal (MCP)- and metatarsophalangeal (MTP)-level amputation and reconstruction of all 4 paws of a young female domestic shorthair cat. All 4 paws, the ears, and the distal portion of the tail underwent severe frostbite injury resulting in tissue death. Following MCP and MTP amputation, weight-bearing surface reconstruction was achieved using metacarpal and metatarsal paw-pad advancement flaps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Temporary Circular External Fixation for Spanning the Traumatized Ankle Joint.

JBJS Essent Surg Tech

December 2024

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Background: Temporary ankle-spanning circular fixation aims to provide osseous stability while (1) allowing access to and recovery of the traumatized soft-tissue envelope and (2) facilitating safe, comfortable, and clinically relevant cross-sectional imaging for surgical planning. It is most commonly utilized in a "span-scan-plan" treatment strategy in cases of peri-articular fractures around the ankle. Conventional monolateral fixators are prone to morbidity at the half-pin sites in the foot and variation in construct stability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures.

JBJS Essent Surg Tech

November 2024

Department of Orthopaedics Foot and Ankle Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Article Synopsis
  • Metatarsal fractures, particularly affecting the fifth metatarsal, are common injuries, making up 5-6% of outpatient fractures, with zone 2 fractures—specifically Jones fractures—being difficult to manage due to poor blood supply and higher nonunion rates.
  • Surgical treatment, particularly open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), is preferred for Jones fractures, as it leads to better healing rates compared to conservative treatment methods.
  • The surgical technique involves careful anatomical marking and using a guidewire for screw placement to compress the fracture, followed by a recovery period that includes non-weight-bearing and gradual weight-bearing activities.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!