Simplification to atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy for HIV-1 treated individuals on virological suppression: 48-week efficacy and safety results.

AIDS

aDepartment of Infectious Diseases, San Raffaele Scientific Institute bUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele cClinic of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Department of Health Sciences, S Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan dDivision of Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata eClinical Department, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, Rome fInfectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova gDivision of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, DIBIC 'Luigi Sacco', University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Published: September 2014

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the 48-week virological efficacy of atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) monotherapy vs. ATV/r along with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTIs) in HIV-1 treated individuals with HIV-RNA less than 50 copies/ml.

Methods: A multicentre, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial. HIV-1 treated individuals on ATV/r 300/100 mg along with two NRTIs were randomized to receive ATV/r monotherapy or to maintain their antiretroviral regimen. The primary endpoint was the confirmed viral rebound (CVR: two consecutive HIV-RNA >50 copies/ml) or treatment discontinuation for any reason. Individuals who experienced CVR on ATV/r monotherapy reintroduced NRTIs and discontinued the study if HIV-RNA was more than 50 copies/ml after 12 weeks since reintensification.

Results: One hundred and three patients enrolled. By week 48, 11 patients in ATV/r arm and two in ATV/r along with two NRTIs experienced CVR; four (8%) patients in ATV/r and eight (15%) in ATV/r along with two NRTIs discontinued. At the 48-week primary efficacy analysis (re-intensification = failure), treatment success was 73% in ATV/r arm and 85% in ATV/r along with two NRTIs [difference -12.1%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -27.8 to 2.1]. According to the analysis considering re-intensification is equal to success, treatment success was 92% in ATV/r arm and 85% in the ATV/r along with two NRTIs arm (difference 7.5%, 95% CI -4.7 to 19.8). At CVR, no mutation was observed in ATV/r arm and reintensification with NRTIs was effective in all individuals. Overall, Grade 3-4 (P = 0.003) and grade 3-4 drug-related (P = 0.027) adverse events were less frequent in ATV/r arm. A significant increase in total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol was observed as well as a significant improvement in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, fasting glucose, liver fibrosis and alkaline phosphatase was observed in ATV/r monotherapy in comparison with ATV/r along with two NRTIs.

Conclusion: ATV/r monotherapy treatment simplification showed lower virological efficacy in comparison with maintaining triple therapy; NRTIs reintroduction was effective in all the individuals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000407DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atv/r monotherapy
20
atv/r arm
20
atv/r
18
atv/r nrtis
16
hiv-1 treated
12
treated individuals
12
nrtis
9
virological efficacy
8
experienced cvr
8
nrtis discontinued
8

Similar Publications

The 96-week results of the Monotherapy Once a Day with Atazanavir/r (MODAt) study [NCT01511809] showed an inferior virological efficacy of atazanavir (ATV)/ritonavir monotherapy versus triple therapy, which was promptly retrieved by the reintroduction of nucleoside/nucleotide inhibitors of reverse transcriptase [N(n)RTIs]. We aimed to identify potential relationships between ATV exposure and clinical outcome in HIV-1 subjects treated with ATV/ritonavir monotherapy [ATV/r 300/100 mg] versus ATV/ritonavir triple therapy [ATV/r 300/100 mg+2NRTIs]. A chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometry was applied to analyze ATV plasma concentrations in a pharmacokinetic sub-study from the MODAt trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cerebrospinal fluid analysis for HIV replication and biomarkers of immune activation and neurodegeneration in long-term atazanavir/ritonavir monotherapy treated patients.

Medicine (Baltimore)

July 2016

Department of Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Neuroradiology Unit, Head and Neck Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK Division of Biological Chemistry, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) viral escape is a concern in ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors monotherapy. The aim was to assess HIV-RNA, biomarkers of immune activation and neurodegeneration, and atazanavir concentrations in CSF of patients on successful long-term atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) monotherapy.

Methods: This is a substudy of the multicentric, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial monotherapy once a day with atazanavir/ritonavir (NCT01511809), comparing the ongoing ATV/r along with 2 nucleoside retrotranscriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) regimen to a simplified ATV/r monotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: PI/r monotherapy has been suggested as an attainable maintenance strategy in patients achieving stable HIV suppression in plasma. The objective of trial was to compare the virological outcome of two different PI/r QD monotherapy strategies (LPV/r or DRV/r) with maintaining a triple PI/r-based ARV regimen.

Material And Methods: Phase III, open-label, non-inferiority (-12% margin), randomized trial of HIV adults with HIV-RNA <50 cp/mL for at least 48 weeks while on PI/r-based cART, CD4 nadir >100 cell/mm(3), without previous PIs virological failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The 48-week interim analysis of the MODAT study showed that confirmed virologic failure (CVF) was more frequent in patients simplifying to ATV/r monotherapy compared to maintaining ATV/r-based triple therapy. The DSMB recommended stopping study enrollment but continuing follow-up of enrolled patients. We present the 96-week efficacy analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!