Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of vaporesection without a morcellator, and vapoenucleation with a morcellator in thulium laser prostatectomy for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction.
Methods: Between March 2010 and January 2013, 405 patients underwent thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy. Among these patients, 150 patients who underwent thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy without a morcellator (n = 75) or with a morcellator (n = 75) were analyzed in a propensity matching study. Outcome measures included International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life score, maximum flow rate, postvoid residual, total operating time, laser time and resected tissue weight.
Results: No significant differences were noted between the thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy without a morcellator and thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy with a morcellator groups, including the prostate volume (50.3 vs 51.9 mL) and postoperative prostate volume (22.4 vs 18.7 mL). However, there were differences between the groups in total operating time (72.8 vs 61.0 min, P = 0.023) and laser activating time (24.5 vs 19.9 min, P = 0.037). Thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy with a morcellator showed greater resected tissue volume than thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy without a morcellator (9.0 vs 18.2 g, P = 0.029). There were also significant differences in total retrieval efficiency (1.14 vs 1.67 g/min, P = 0.031). There were no significant differences in improvement of International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life scores and urodynamic findings between the two groups, except for the International Prostate Symptom Score (11.2 vs 7.3, P = 0.028) at 6 weeks after surgery.
Conclusion: Thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy with a morcellator provides superior reduction of prostate volume and better short-term clinical outcomes than thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy without a morcellator in the treatment of patients with benign prostatic obstruction. Furthermore, thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser prostatectomy with a morcellator can offer a shorter operative time.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.12547 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!