A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of retention forces and resistance to fatigue of attachment systems for overdentures: plastic and metal components. | LitMetric

Evaluation of retention forces and resistance to fatigue of attachment systems for overdentures: plastic and metal components.

Implant Dent

*Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. †Private Practice, Porto Alegre, Brazil. ‡Adjunct Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. §Adjunct Professor, Department of Implant Odontology and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, Brazil.

Published: August 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares retention forces of three different overdenture attachment systems made from metal and plastic components.
  • The Ball-Attachment (metal) had the highest and most consistent retention values, while the O-Ring (plastic) had the lowest.
  • The research indicates that metal attachments provide better retention than plastic ones, which can impact the stability of dentures over time.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare retention forces of 3 overdenture attachment systems with metal and plastic components.

Materials And Methods: Four samples of each system evaluated (Ball-Attachment [metal]; O-Ring, and ERA [plastic]) were prepared and underwent fatigue and retention force in a universal testing machine. Maximum retention force (N) was measured at 6 time points (from 0 to 36 months-0.5 mm/min). Two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used (α = 0.05).

Results: The Ball-Attachment group showed the highest retention values, statistically greater than the other systems, without differences during the trial (42.75-44.75). The ERA group had intermediate values and a statistically significant decrease during the trial (20.75-14). The lowest retention forces were found for the O-Ring group (13.75-11.75), with no statistical differences during the trial.

Conclusion: Retention forces are significantly affected by abutment type because the metal retainer was more retentive than plastics, possibly providing better fixation of the prosthesis in position, and more difficult to remove. After 6 months of simulation, retentiveness of both plastic components was similar. There was no fracture of any component.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000093DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retention forces
16
attachment systems
8
retention force
8
values statistically
8
retention
6
evaluation retention
4
forces
4
forces resistance
4
resistance fatigue
4
fatigue attachment
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!