A systematic review and meta-analysis of the standard versus mini-incision posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty

University of Bristol Musculoskeletal Research Unit, AOC (Lower Level), Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

Published: October 2014

The mini-incision posterior approach may appeal to surgeons comfortable with the standard posterior approach to the hip. We present the first systematic review and meta-analysis of these two approaches. Twelve randomised controlled trials and four non-randomised trials comprising of 1498 total hip arthroplasties were included. The mini-incision posterior approach was associated with an early improvement in Harris hip score of 1.8 points (P<0.001), reduced operating time (5minutes, P<0.001), length of hospital stay (14hours, P<0.001), intraoperative and total blood loss (63ml, P<0.001 and 119ml, P<0.001 respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of dislocation, nerve injury, infection or venous thromboembolic events. The minimally invasive posterior approach appears to provide a safe and acceptable alternative to the standard incision posterior approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

posterior approach
16
mini-incision posterior
12
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
total hip
8
meta-analysis standard
4
standard versus
4
versus mini-incision
4
posterior
4
approach
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!