A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Post-chemoradiation intraoperative electron-beam radiation therapy boost in resected locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results focused on topographic pattern of locoregional relapse. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) generally have poor outcomes, prompting a study on recurrence risks in those treated with chemoradiotherapy and surgery.
  • The study involved 335 patients, with an emphasis on analyzing factors linked to locoregional recurrence (LRR) over an extensive median follow-up period of 72.6 months.
  • Key findings identified several high-risk factors for LRR, including distal margin distance, resection status, and tumor grade, leading to the development of a prognostic index to improve personalized treatment strategies.

Article Abstract

Background: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have a dismal prognosis. We investigated outcomes and risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), surgery and IOERT.

Methods: A total of 335 patients with LARC [⩾cT3 93% and/or cN+ 69%) were studied. In multivariate analyses, risk factors for LRR, IFLR and OFLR were assessed.

Results: Median follow-up was 72.6 months (range, 4-205). In multivariate analysis distal margin distance ⩽10 mm [HR 2.46, p = 0.03], R1 resection [HR 5.06, p = 0.02], tumor regression grade 1-2 [HR 2.63, p = 0.05] and tumor grade 3 [HR 7.79, p < 0.001] were associated with an increased risk of LRR. A risk model was generated to determine a prognostic index for individual patients with LARC.

Conclusions: Overall results after multimodality treatment of LARC are promising. Classification of risk factors for LRR has contributed to propose a prognostic index that could allow us to guide risk-adapted tailored treatment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.05.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factors
12
locally advanced
8
advanced rectal
8
rectal cancer
8
factors lrr
8
risk
5
post-chemoradiation intraoperative
4
intraoperative electron-beam
4
electron-beam radiation
4
radiation therapy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!