Medical care costs and hospitalization in patients with bipolar disorder treated with atypical antipsychotics.

Am Health Drug Benefits

Executive Director of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Plainsboro, NJ.

Published: September 2012

Background: A large proportion of costs associated with the treatment of bipolar disorder are attributable to patient hospitalization.

Objective: To investigate medical care costs and hospitalization rates among patients with bipolar disorder who were managed with aripiprazole compared with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study assessed patients who were aged 18 to 64 years, diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and who were receiving therapy with aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone. This study was based on data from the PharMetrics claims database between January 1, 2003, and September 30, 2008. The study used a time-to-event framework. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of each atypical antipsychotic on time to hospitalization, including all-cause and mental health-related reasons. Generalized linear models were used to compare costs per treated patient per month between the groups. Aripiprazole therapy was the reference group for all comparisons.

Results: Aripiprazole therapy showed a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause hospitalizations compared with olanzapine (HR, 1.4), quetiapine (HR, 1.4), risperidone (HR, 1.2), and ziprasidone (HR, 1.7); and for mental health-related hospitalizations compared with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone (HR, 1.3 each), and ziprasidone (HR, 1.7). Ziprasidone had higher unadjusted all-cause medical costs (US $1151 ± $2928) and unadjusted mental health-related costs (US $711 ± $2263) than the other antipsychotics that were included in this study, whereas aripiprazole had the lowest all-cause (US $804 ± $2523) and mental health-related costs (US $475 ± $2145) compared with the other antipsychotics. Quetiapine had the highest all-cause costs (US $1221; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1180-1263), and ziprasidone had the highest mental health-related costs (US $823; 95% CI, 754-898). Adjusted inpatient and emergency department all-cause costs were significantly lower for aripiprazole compared with all other atypical antipsychotics (P <.05), except olanzapine; however, the adjusted inpatient and emergency department mental health-related costs were significantly lower for aripiprazole only when compared with ziprasidone (P <.05).

Conclusions: The costs of medical care for patients with bipolar disorder differ based on the type of medication used, which can affect the rate of hospitalization. Treatment with aripiprazole was associated with fewer hospitalizations, longer time to hospitalization, and therefore the lowest all-cause and mental health-related medical costs compared with olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone. Therefore, aripiprazole may offer an economic advantage over other atypical antipsychotics in patients with bipolar disorder.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4031693PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental health-related
20
bipolar disorder
16
olanzapine quetiapine
16
quetiapine risperidone
16
compared olanzapine
12
risperidone ziprasidone
12
health-related costs
12
costs
10
medical care
8
care costs
8

Similar Publications

Background: Comprehensive health-related quality of life (QOL) assessment under severe respondent burden constraints requires improved single-item scales for frequently surveyed domains. This article documents how new single-item-per-domain (SIPD) QOL General (QGEN-8) measures were constructed for domains common to SF-36 and results from the first psychometric tests comparing scores for the new measure in relation to those for the SF-36 profile and summary components.

Research Design: Online NORC surveys of adults, ages 19-93 (mean=52 y) representing the US population in 2020 (N=1648) included QGEN-8 and SF-36 items measuring physical (PF), social (SF), role physical (RP) and role emotional (RE) functioning and feelings of bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), and mental health (MH).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite the significant public health burden of maternal mental health disorders in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), limited data are available on their effects on early childhood development (ECD), nutritional status, and child health in the region.

Aims: This study investigated the association between maternal mental health and ECD, nutritional status, and common childhood illnesses, while controlling for biological, social, financial, and health-related factors and/or confounders.

Method: As part of the Innovative Partnership for Universal and Sustainable Healthcare (i-PUSH) program evaluation study, initiated in November 2019, a cohort of low-income rural families, including pregnant women or women of childbearing age with children under five, was recruited for this study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in intestinal failure (IF) patients after different modes of intestinal rehabilitation.

Methods: HRQoL was assessed using the generic 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36, ver. 2) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in 6 different areas: diet, sleep, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, and other symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: In patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa), prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) prolongs treatment-free survival. Data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are lacking.

Methods: A retrospective assessment of validated PROMs (12-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite, and Decision Regret Scale [DRS]) was performed before and after PSMA-RGS for oligorecurrent PCa.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Oregon introduced a state policy, HB 3090, on October 6, 2017, which increased requirements on emergency departments (EDs) to improve transitions to outpatient mental health care. The objective of this study was to examine the policy's impact among low-income adolescent patients who face severe barriers to follow-up.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of visits by Medicaid enrollees ages 14-18 presenting to any Oregon ED for a mental health concern between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!