Role of intraoral distractors in management of cranial synostosis: An initial experience.

Ann Maxillofac Surg

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, ADC (R and R), New Delhi, India.

Published: January 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assesses the use of strip craniectomy paired with distraction osteogenesis for treating craniosynostosis in two selected cases.
  • After a delay of 4 days, distraction was executed using intraoral devices, achieving 25-28 mm separation of the skull segments.
  • Results showed increased skull size, enhanced cognitive function, and reduced symptoms associated with elevated intracranial pressure, indicating that this combined treatment is effective.

Article Abstract

Objective: The objective of the following study is to evaluate the results of strip craniectomy with distraction osteogenesis, using the intraoral distractor devices, as a modality of treatment for craniosynostosis.

Materials And Methods: Two cases of cranial synostosis were selected for this study. The cases were operated for strip craniectomy with distraction osteogenesis using a pair of miniaturized intraoral distractor devices. Distraction was carried out after a latency period of 4 days at a rate of 0.5 mm twice a day. Total separation of osteotomized segments achieved was in the range of 25-28 mm.

Results: Both patients were evaluated clinico-radiologically at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. There was an increase in the occipital frontal circumference with improvement in the contour of the skull. Both the cases showed marked improvement of bowel habits, bladder control and cognitive behavior. Radiologically copper-beaten appearance reduced considerably suggesting improved intracranial pressure.

Conclusion: Combination of distraction osteogenesis with strip craniectomy for the management of craniosynostosis is an effective treatment modality with promising results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4073456PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.133068DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

strip craniectomy
12
distraction osteogenesis
12
cranial synostosis
8
craniectomy distraction
8
intraoral distractor
8
distractor devices
8
role intraoral
4
intraoral distractors
4
distractors management
4
management cranial
4

Similar Publications

Background: Myelomeningocele and sagittal craniosynostosis are 2 neurosurgical pathologies with complications such as increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and hydrocephalus. While the 2 defects commonly occur independently, their simultaneous occurrence is exceptionally rare.

Observations: The authors report the case of a newborn male diagnosed with a simultaneous myelomeningocele and sagittal craniosynostosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effectiveness of a surgical procedure (extended strip craniectomy with bilateral barrel staving) for treating isolated craniosynostosis of the sagittal suture in infants, specifically focusing on its impact on cranial shape without directly addressing forehead issues.
  • Results showed significant improvements in aspects like bossing angle and cephalic index over a year, although the cranial shape did not entirely match that of healthy peers, indicating partial normalization but not complete correction.
  • The research validates 3D photogrammetry as a useful noninvasive tool for assessing cranial changes post-surgery, suggesting potential for wider clinical applications in monitoring cranial morphology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The surgical management of craniosynostosis varies without consensus on technique or standard outcomes reporting. The authors of this study aimed to investigate current surgical management of craniosynostosis in the United States.

Methods: Two hundred seventy-five surgeons actively treating craniosynostosis in the United States were surveyed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prior studies have linked the timing of craniosynostosis surgeries to several postoperative outcomes. However, less is known regarding the influence of sociodemographic factors on surgical timing for this population. This study investigates the influence of social vulnerability index (SVI), race, and urbanicity on the timing of craniosynostosis surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Craniosynostosis, a condition involving the premature fusion of cranial sutures, can impair brain development and potentially lead to developmental delays. This study compares open cranial vault remodeling versus endoscopic strip craniectomy treatment for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis, primarily focusing on development outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric surgery center, involving all 45 patients treated surgically for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis from 2013 to 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!