Objective: To investigate the reasons for prescription change of α1-blockers in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Methods: The ratio and interval of prescription change were assessed in 3200 patients who were eligible for the study and took 1 of 4 different α1-blockers (doxazosin, alfuzosin, tamsulosin, or silodosin). The reasons for prescription change and evaluation of efficacy were analyzed in 444 patients whose medical records were complete.
Results: Prescription change to another α1-blocker occurred in 694 of 3200 patients (21.7%), and the mean duration of taking their first α1-blocker was 10.8 ± 8.2 weeks. Lack of efficacy (52.7%) was the main reason for changing α1-blockers, followed by adverse events (33.1%), relatively high cost compared with other α1-blockers (7.0%), inconvenience of taking drugs (4.1%), and cardiovascular comorbidity (3.2%). The mean duration of treatment according to each reason is as follows: increased adverse events: 6.3 ± 5.2 weeks, relatively high cost compared with other α1-blockers: 8.7 ± 4.5 weeks, cardiovascular comorbidity: 10.5 ± 6.8 weeks, inconvenience of taking drugs: 10.8 ± 3.9 weeks, and lack of efficacy: 14.8 ± 6.8 weeks. The proportion of prescription change (16.3%) and prescription change because of hemodynamic adverse events (2.4%) in the silodosin group were low compared with those in the other groups (P <.05 and P <.006, respectively), but prescription change because of a ejaculation disorder was high in the silodosin group (30.1%, P <.001).
Conclusion: Major reasons for prescription change in patients taking α1-blockers were lack of efficacy and adverse events. In the silodosin group, the proportion of prescription change was significantly low compared with that in the other 3 groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.068 | DOI Listing |
J Ethnopharmacol
January 2025
Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. Electronic address:
Ethnopharmacological Relevance: Gardenia jasminoides J. Ellis (Gardeniae Fructus, GF) is a widely used herbal medicine in many prescriptions. However, inappropriate application of GF may induce hepatotoxicity, which greatly challenges its clinical application.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hand Surg Am
January 2025
The Curtis National Hand Center, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address:
The opioid epidemic has been a defining crisis in American health care. Many attempts to address the epidemic have focused on issues around opioid prescribing. Legislation at the state and federal levels has been passed; however, the results from these policies have been mixed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJMIR Cancer
January 2025
Department of Health and Exercise Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Background: Exercise interventions are among the best-known interventions for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Rural survivors of cancer, however, report specific barriers to engaging in exercise programs and lack overall access to effective programs.
Objective: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the feasibility of a novel telehealth exercise program designed specifically for rural survivors of cancer with CRF.
Background: Wider availability of cannabis through medical and recreational legalization (MCL alone and RCL+MCL) has been hypothesized to contribute to reductions in opioid use, misuse, and related harms. We examined whether state adoption of cannabis laws was associated with changes in opioid outcomes overall and stratified by cannabis use.
Methods: Using National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data from 2015 to 2019, we estimated cannabis law associations with opioid (prescription opioid misuse and/or heroin use) misuse and use disorder.
J Law Med
November 2024
Sydney Health Law, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney.
Recently, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) updated its guidance on cosmetic injectables advertising. The updates confirm that all direct or indirect advertising of cosmetic injectable products, including botulinum toxins or dermal fillers, is prohibited in Australia. While some commentators have lamented these updates, they present no changes to the law.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!