This study of 4,359 Medicare patients in 107 noncancer stratified surgical Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) tested the hypothesis that patients with a diagnosis of a malignancy (i.e., cancer) in these DRGs would have higher resource utilization than patients without a diagnosis of a malignancy (i.e., noncancer) in these same surgical DRGs. The 1,008 cancer patients had 3.2 times the financial loss ($1,617 per patient vs. $510 per patient) compared to the 3,351 noncancer patients (P less than .05). Patients with cancer had a greater percentage of outliers, more diagnosis (P less than .0001) and procedures (P less than .0001) per patient, and a higher mortality (P less than .01) than patients without cancer. These findings raise the question of the equity of DRG payment for patients with cancer in many surgical DRGs. Financial disincentives to treat certain groups of Medicare cancer patients at our hospital may affect both their access and quality of care in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930410114DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer patients
12
patients cancer
12
patients
10
surgical diagnostic
8
diagnostic groups
8
patients diagnosis
8
diagnosis malignancy
8
surgical drgs
8
cancer
7
hospital costs
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!