Introduction: For cholecystectomy (CHE), both the needlescopic three-trocar technique with 2-3-mm instruments (needlescopic cholecystectomy (NC)) and the umbilically assisted transvaginal technique with rigid instruments (transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC)) have been established for further reduction of the trauma remaining from laparoscopy.
Methods: To compare the further outcome of both techniques for elective CHE in female patients, we analyzed the secondary end points of a prospective randomized single-center trial (needlescopic versus transvaginal cholecystectomy (NATCH) trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0168577), in particular, satisfaction with aesthetics, overall satisfaction, abdominal pain, and incidence of trocar hernias postoperatively at both 3 and 6 months. After 3 months, the domains "satisfaction" and "pain" of the German version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-d) were additionally evaluated to detect respective complications. A gynecological control examination was conducted in all TVC patients after 6 months.
Results: Forty patients were equally randomized into the therapy and the control groups between February 2010 and June 2012. No significant differences were found for overall satisfaction with the surgical result, abdominal pain, sexual function, and the rate of trocar hernias. However, aesthetics were rated significantly better by TVC patients both after 3 and after 6 months (P = 0.004 and P < 0.001). There were no postoperative pathological gynecological findings.
Conclusions: Following TVC, there is a significantly better aesthetic result as compared to NC, even at 3 and 6 months after the procedure. No difference was found for sexual function.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1218-2 | DOI Listing |
BMC Surg
November 2024
Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, being a prevalent abdominal surgical procedure, has transitioned through various innovative stages aimed at reducing the procedure's invasiveness. These stages encompass Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC), Mini Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (MLC), Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES), and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (RALC). The purpose of this review is to trace the evolution of minimally invasive cholecystectomy techniques, assess their status, and identify emerging trends and challenges in the field.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJSLS
April 2024
Department of General Surgery, Naval Medical Readiness and Training Command, San Diego, California, USA. (Drs Judge, Bandle, Gadbois, and Wisbach).
Objectives: We present our initial clinical experience applying Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy in ten patients at a military institution.
Methods: A posterior colpotomy was created to accommodate a single site working port used to facilitate dissection and gallbladder mobilization under direct visualization via an infraumbilical port. The specimen was retrieved through the vagina and the colpotomy was closed with absorbable suture under direct visualization.
Cureus
January 2023
General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Max Hospital, Mohali, IND.
Background: Recently, a great interest has arisen in hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-cholecystectomy (NOTES-C). It has the potential to cause less postoperative pain and may offer better cosmesis over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
Patients And Methods: A total of 112 females who underwent conventional cholecystectomy were compared with 108 patients of hybrid transvaginal NOTES-cholecystectomy (TV NOTES-C).
Int J Womens Health
December 2022
Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Center for General, Vascular, Thoracic and Visceral Surgery, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Hospital OWL, Campus Bielefeld Bethel, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Introduction: Despite that NOTES produces at least matchable clinical long-term results when compared to laparoscopy, still a restraint within the medical community and among patients is evident. Consequently, it might be meaningful to evaluate factors of patient's NOTES perception to promote its acceptance. NOTES is still quite novel and questionnaires regarding its perception by the public is still lacking even so in the Middle East.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Minim Invasive Gynecol
October 2022
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Services, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas.
Study Objective: To demonstrate the utility of vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization after a failed attempt at bilateral tubal ligation at the time of previous cesarean section.
Design: Stepwise demonstration with narrated video footage.
Setting: There is evidence to support the statistically significant superiority of vNOTES compared with conventional laparoscopy (CL) in terms of patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, time to recovery, and cosmetic results in bilateral salpingectomies for permanent sterilization [1].
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!