Adverse events following implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation: a systematic review.

J Interv Card Electrophysiol

Center for Clinical Evidence Research, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Published: August 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are effective for preventing sudden cardiac death, but patients should be informed about potential adverse events associated with their use.
  • A review of studies identified low rates of serious adverse events during hospitalization (2.8-3.6%) and variable rates of long-term complications after ICD implantation, but the quality of evidence for these long-term effects was low.
  • Up to 21% of patients may experience inappropriate shocks from the device, highlighting the importance of patient counseling about risks involved.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death, but patients need to be counseled about potential harms. We summarized the evidence on adverse events from ICDs with a focus on ICD use for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 2002 through 2012 for reports of adverse events from ICDs implanted for primary prevention or mixed indications (primary and secondary prevention). Studies had to have ≥500 patients and specify patient numerators and denominators.

Results: Data from 35 independent cohorts reported in 53 articles were included. Reports from one registry provided high quality evidence on adverse events during hospitalization for ICD implantation. Adverse events ranged from 2.8 to 3.6%. Serious adverse events ranged from 1.2 to 1.4%. The most frequent serious adverse events were pneumothorax (0.4-0.5%) and cardiac arrest (0.3%). The quality of the evidence for long-term adverse events was low. Frequency of adverse events post-hospitalization was variable, as was follow-up: device-related complications <0.1-6.4% (2-49 months), lead-related complications <0.1-3.9% (1.5-40 months), infection 0.2-3.7% (1.5-49 months), and thrombosis 0.2-2.9% (1.5-49 months). Evidence for inappropriate shock was of moderate quality with 3-21% of patients experiencing at least one inappropriate shock during 1 to 5 years of follow-up.

Limitations: The limitation of the evidence reviewed in this study is low quality evidence for adverse events post-hospitalization. Evidence is predominantly from mixed primary and secondary prevention populations.

Conclusions: In-hospital adverse events after ICD implantation are infrequent. The estimates for long-term adverse events are uncertain. Up to one-fifth of patients receive inappropriate shocks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9913-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse events
36
adverse
9
implantable cardioverter
8
sudden cardiac
8
evidence adverse
8
events
8
events icds
8
primary prevention
8
quality evidence
8
events ranged
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!