A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Estimating the density of femoral head trabecular bone from hip fracture patients using computed tomography scan data. | LitMetric

The purpose of this study was to compare computed tomography density (ρ ) obtained using typical clinical computed tomography scan parameters to ash density (ρ ), for the prediction of densities of femoral head trabecular bone from hip fracture patients. An experimental study was conducted to investigate the relationships between ρ and ρ and between each of these densities and ρ and ρ . Seven human femoral heads from hip fracture patients were computed tomography-scanned ex vivo, and 76 cylindrical trabecular bone specimens were collected. Computed tomography density was computed from computed tomography images by using a calibration Hounsfield units-based equation, whereas ρ, ρ and ρ were determined experimentally. A large variation was found in the mean Hounsfield units of the bone cores (HU) with a constant bias from ρ to ρ of 42.5 mg/cm. Computed tomography and ash densities were linearly correlated (R = 0.55, p < 0.001). It was demonstrated that ρ provided a good estimate of ρ (R = 0.78, p < 0.001) and is a strong predictor of ρ (R = 0.99, p < 0.001). In addition, the ρ was linearly related to ρ (R = 0.43, p < 0.001) and ρ (R = 0.56, p < 0.001). In conclusion, mineral density was an appropriate predictor of ρ and ρ , and ρ was not a surrogate for ρ . There were linear relationships between ρ and physical densities; however, following the experimental protocols of this study to determine ρ , considerable scatter was present in the ρ relationships.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954411914540285DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computed tomography
24
trabecular bone
12
hip fracture
12
fracture patients
12
femoral head
8
head trabecular
8
bone hip
8
computed
8
patients computed
8
tomography scan
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!