AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Haas and Hyrax appliances in achieving rapid maxillary expansion in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.
  • A total of 48 patients were divided into two groups, with measurements taken before and after treatment to assess changes in transverse width of the upper dental arch.
  • Results indicated that both appliances effectively increased dental arch width, with the Hyrax appliance showing slightly greater expansion, though no significant differences were noted between the two methods.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the transverse effect of rapid maxillary expansion in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate while comparing the Haas and Hyrax appliances.

Methods: The sample consisted of 48 patients divided into two groups: Group I = 25 patients treated with modified Haas appliance (mean age: 10 years and 8 months); and Group II = 23 patients treated with Hyrax appliance (mean age: 10 years and 6 months). Cast models were taken during pre-expansion and after removal of the appliance, at the end of the retention period. The models were scanned with the aid of the 3 Shape R700 3D scanner. Initial and final transverse distances were measured at cusp tips and cervical-palatal points of maxillary teeth by using the Ortho Analyzer 3D software.

Results: The mean expansion obtained between cusp tips and between cervical-palatal points was, respectively: for inter-canine width, 4.80 mm and 4.35 mm with the Haas appliance and 5.91 mm and 5.91 mm with the Hyrax appliance; as for first deciduous molars or first deciduous premolars, the values obtained were 6.46 mm and 5.90 mm in the Haas group, and 7.11 mm and 6.65 mm in the Hyrax group; with regard to first molars, values were 6.11 mm and 5.24 mm in the Haas group, and 7.55 mm and 6.31 mm in the Hyrax group.

Conclusion: Rapid maxillary expansion significantly increased the transverse dimensions of the upper dental arch in patients with cleft palate, with no significant differences between the Hass and Hyrax expanders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4296605PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.039-045.oarDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

haas hyrax
8
upper dental
8
dental arch
8
arch patients
8
patients unilateral
8
unilateral complete
8
complete cleft
8
cleft lip
8
lip palate
8
rapid maxillary
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To evaluate the effect of rapid palatal expansion (RPE) using Haas-type expanders on children's oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL) and compare said effect with that previously reported for the use of Hyrax-type expanders.

Materials And Methods: Forty participants aged 8-10 years with transverse maxillary deficiency were treated using Haas appliances. OHRQOL was measured using the CPQ before RPE, during RPE (T), at the end of RPE (T), and 1 month after appliance removal (T).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is a routine method for correcting transverse maxillary deficiency. This paper investigated the effect of RME on anchorage alveolar bone and examined the differences between micro-implant-assisted RME and conventional RME.

Methods: Relevant articles were selected from the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Self-perceived pain in Hyrax versus other maxillary expansion orthodontic appliances: a systematic review of clinical studies.

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent

June 2023

Department of Orofacial Pain and TMJ Disorders, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, 625 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.

Purpose: To evaluate self-perceived pain levels in the Hyrax compared to other types of maxillary expansion (ME) appliances in growing patients.

Methods: An unrestricted search of indexed databases and manual searching were performed up to October 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the Hyrax appliance with other ME appliances were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference at the midpalatal suture opening after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using Expander with Differential Opening (EDO), Hyrax-type and Haas-type expanders.

Methods: Occlusal radiographs of 52 patients (19 males and 33 females; average age= 9.46?1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Compare changes in arch form after RME achieved by Expander with Differential Opening (EDO), Hyrax-type and Haas-type expanders.

Materials And Methods: Dental models were obtained from 61 patients aged 7-11 years before expansion (T1) and 6 months after the active phase when the appliances were removed (T2). The groups were formed according to the expander used: EDO (n = 18, mean age: 9.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!