[A comparison of the performances between healthy older adults and persons with Alzheimer's disease on the Rey auditory verbal learning test and the Test de rappel libre/rappel indicé 16 items].

Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil

Département de psychologie et Institut des sciences cognitives, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec, Canada, Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Published: June 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • The research compared the performance of healthy elderly individuals and Alzheimer's patients on the RL/RI 16 and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), which are used to assess verbal episodic memory.
  • The RAVLT was found to be slightly more sensitive and effective at distinguishing between the two groups, with no overlap in classifications, while the RL/RI 16 showed notable ceiling effects, especially in healthy controls.
  • The study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of both tests in evaluating episodic memory, suggesting that the RAVLT may better reflect recent memory performance, while the RL/RI 16 can offer insights into long-term memory despite its limitations with false recognitions.

Article Abstract

The aim of this research was to compare the performances of healthy elderly (n=40) and individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n=40) on the RL/RI 16, a French adaptation of the Free and cued selective reminding test (FCSRT) and on the Rey auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT). These two verbal episodic memory tests are frequently used in clinical practice in French-speaking populations. Results showed that the RAVLT demonstrated a slightly better sensitivity and sensibility than the RL/RI 16. The RAVLT allowed to classify participants of the two groups without any overlap. Moreover, no floor effect was observed in the RAVLT in AD and ceiling effects were less pronounced in normal controls that in the RL/RI 16. Results observed in the RL/RI 16 showed important ceiling effects and a decline in performance on free recall throughout trials in AD patients. Nonetheless, the latter tool was less sensitive to recency effects than the RAVLT and may thus provide a more realistic view of the long-term memory performance of these patients. The semantic cues provided in the RL/RI 16 appeared to increase intrusions in AD whereas the interference list in the RAVLT was the first source of false recognitions in both healthy elderly and AD. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates both the advantages and disadvantages of these two tools in the evaluation of episodic memory in elderly with and without cognitive deficits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2014.0469DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

performances healthy
8
alzheimer's disease
8
rey auditory
8
auditory verbal
8
verbal learning
8
learning test
8
healthy elderly
8
episodic memory
8
ceiling effects
8
ravlt
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!