Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to document the characteristics of C-shaped canal systems in permanent mandibular second molars using a combination of orthopantomogram (OPT) and cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging.
Methods: Two hundred participants (94 men and 106 women, mean age = 35 years) who underwent both routine CBCT and OPT examinations were enrolled. One endodontist and 1 oral radiologist examined the images of 339 mandibular second molars and described the radiographic features of C-shaped canals from OPT images as confirmed by CBCT imaging. Root morphology was classified as nonfused (NFRI-II) or fused (FRI-III) based on OPT images. Cross-sectional root canal configurations (C1-C5) were identified from CBCT imaging at 3 different levels (coronal, middle, and apical). Frequency distributions of root morphology and root canal configurations were compared at each level, and interobserver reliability was tested using the Cohen kappa test.
Results: Of the 339 teeth, 29 (8.6 %) had C-shaped root canal systems. Most of the root canals were NFR type (86%); only 2% had C-shaped root canals (all NFRII). In the FR category, 23 teeth with C-shaped canals were equally distributed between the FRI and FRII subtypes. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect (κ = 0.89 and κ = 0.91; right and left second molars, respectively). Per CBCT imaging, the most common configuration was C3 at all levels; no C5 case was detected.
Conclusions: OPT usage can assist in recognizing and diagnosing C-shaped root canal systems. Radicular fusion or proximity is a characteristic feature of C-shaped canal systems. However, nonfused root appearances should also be considered suspicious.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!