Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers.

Clin Imaging

Marmara Univ. Pendik EAH, Radyoloji AD, Fevzi Cakmak Mahallesi Mimar Sinan Caddesi No: 41, 34899 Ust Kaynarca Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address:

Published: June 2015

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of the iliolumbar ligament (ILL), 12th costa, aortic bifurcation (AB), right renal artery (RRA), and conus medullaris (CM) for numbering of vertebral segments.

Subjects And Methods: Five hundred five patients underwent routine lumbar MRI examinations including a cervicothoracic sagittal scout and T1 and T2-weighted sagittal and axial turbo spin echo images. Images were evaluated by two radiologists separately.

Results: The identifiability of ILL and 12th costa were 85.7% and 48.1%. AB, RRA, and CM were located more caudally in lumbarized S1 and more cranially in sacralized L5 cases.

Conclusion: Landmarks suggested by previous studies are not reliable alternatives to cervicothoracic scout images due to wide ranges of distribution and inconsistencies in identification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.05.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lumbar mri
8
ill 12th
8
12th costa
8
landmark reliable
4
reliable vertebral
4
vertebral enumeration?
4
enumeration? study
4
study 30-tesla
4
30-tesla lumbar
4
mri comparing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!