A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Combined EUS and CT for evaluating gastrointestinal submucosal tumors before endoscopic resection. | LitMetric

Combined EUS and CT for evaluating gastrointestinal submucosal tumors before endoscopic resection.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol

Department of Gastroenterology, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Binzhou Medical University, Weihai, Shandong Province, China.

Published: August 2014

Goals: The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) in predicting the maneuvers for therapeutic endoscopy for gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs).

Methods: Patients with SMTs, who were scheduled for endoscopic resection, were randomized to preoperative performance of both EUS and CT (group A) or EUS only (group B). The following data were collected: therapeutic maneuvers, duration of procedure, dose of propofol, resected lesion size, and complications.

Results: A total of 36 patients were included in group A and 36 patients were included in group B. Endoscopic submucosal excavation was performed in 43 patients, endoscopic full-thickness resection in 18 patients, and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection in 11 patients. No significant differences were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). The coincidence rate between the preoperative program and the actual endoscopic procedures in group A was higher than that in group B (83.3 vs. 61.1%, P<0.05). The procedural time in group A was less than that in group B (39.36±17.83 vs. 48.06±12.03 min, P<0.05), and the dose of propofol in group A was less than that in group B (249.18±125.12 vs. 304.16±102.61 mg, P<0.05). The mean resected lesion size was 2.32±1.46 cm in group A and 2.12±0.75 cm in group B, without differences (P>0.05). A total of 14 cardiopulmonary complications and seven endoscopic complications occurred, without significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: EUS combined with CT can better evaluate SMTs compared with EUS only in predicting the maneuvers for therapeutic endoscopy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000136DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscopic resection
12
gastrointestinal submucosal
8
submucosal tumors
8
eus group
8
patients included
8
included group
8
resection patients
8
endoscopic
7
patients
6
group
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!