Repeatability of usual and fast walking speeds in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev

Department of Respiratory Medicine (Drs Rozenberg and Goldstein and Mr Dolmage) and Respiratory Diagnostic and Evaluation Services (Mr Dolmage and Dr Goldstein), West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Drs Rozenberg, Evans, and Goldstein); and Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, School of Medicine and Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK (Dr Evans).

Published: May 2015

Rationale: Evaluation of the role of walking speeds in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be preceded by an assessment of its repeatability. This study aimed to establish the repeatability of the usual (susual) and fast (sfast) walking speeds among patients with stable COPD and determine the accuracy of manual measurement.

Methods: Participants demonstrated their susual and sfast over 10 m with speed calculated using a stopwatch; the accuracy was confirmed with optical sensors. The walks were repeated after a 5-minute rest; the session was repeated on 2 subsequent days. The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was calculated for both speeds, and their stability over days was determined.

Results: A total of 29 participants (forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 43 ± 25% predicted; FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) = 41 ± 13%; susual = 60.3 ± 11 m·min; sfast = 74.3 ± 11.5 m·min) completed the study. The CRs for the susual and sfast were 7.5 (95% CI: 5.0-10.0) and 7.1 (95% CI: 4.8-9.4) m·min, respectively. There was a small increase in the susual (5%; P < .001) on the second trial of every day and between successive days (5%; P < .001); the sfast was not different between trials (P = .09) and increased only between day 1 and day 2 (4%; P < .0001). There was no difference between the stopwatch and the sensor determined susual (-0.5 [95% CI: -1.1 to 0.1] m·min; P = .12). The small difference (-2.1 [95% CI: -2.7 to -1.5] m·min; P = .0001) between the methods for sfast was within the CR of the sfast.

Conclusions: In patients with moderate to severe COPD, repeated measures of the susual and sfast using a stopwatch support the use of these tests for simple, quick assessments of disability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000072DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

walking speeds
12
susual sfast
12
repeatability usual
8
speeds patients
8
chronic obstructive
8
obstructive pulmonary
8
pulmonary disease
8
m·min small
8
susual
7
sfast
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!