A word of caution about biological inference - Revisiting cysteine covalent state predictions.

FEBS Open Bio

Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 286, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary.

Published: June 2014

The success of methods for predicting the redox state of cysteine residues from the sequence environment seemed to validate the basic assumption that this state is mainly determined locally. However, the accuracy of predictions on randomized sequences or of non-cysteine residues remained high, suggesting that these predictions rather capture global features of proteins such as subcellular localization, which depends on composition. This illustrates that even high prediction accuracy is insufficient to validate implicit assumptions about a biological phenomenon. Correctly identifying the relevant underlying biochemical reasons for the success of a method is essential to gain proper biological insights and develop more accurate and novel bioinformatics tools.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4048844PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2014.03.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

word caution
4
caution biological
4
biological inference
4
inference revisiting
4
revisiting cysteine
4
cysteine covalent
4
covalent state
4
state predictions
4
predictions success
4
success methods
4

Similar Publications

Objective: The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is commonly used to assess word-finding in older adults but performance may be impacted by cultural and linguistic factors. This study aimed to assess cultural bias in BNT performance among older adults, explore sources of this bias and provide clinical guidelines for its use in multicultural settings.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 525 older adults referred for neuropsychological assessment at a large geriatric hospital in a multicultural Canadian city.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with rectal cancer often experience adverse effects on urinary, sexual, and digestive functions. Despite recognised impacts and available treatments, they are not fully integrated into follow-up protocols, thereby hindering appropriate interventions. The aim of the study was to discern the activities conducted in our routine clinical practice outside of clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Professional bodies recommend the use of performance validity tests (PVTs) to aid the interpretation of scores obtained in neuropsychological assessments, but base rates of failure differ according to neurological diagnosis and the associated impairments. This review summarises the PVT literature in people with epilepsy with the aim of establishing base rates of PVT failure and the factors associated with PVT performance in this population.

Methods: Ovid and PubMed databases were searched for studies reporting PVT test performance in people with epilepsy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Imageability, which gauges how easily a word can trigger a mental image, shows significant variability in ratings among different age groups (young, middle-aged, and older adults), raising questions about the reliability of these average ratings.
  • Factors contributing to this variability include word length, frequency, emotional content, and the age at which the word is learned, which indicates that younger and older adults may perceive words differently.
  • Despite inter-rater disagreements, the study found that imageability still significantly influenced visual word recognition in young adults, suggesting it can predict performance well, but emphasizes caution when dealing with smaller datasets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Historically, word of mouth, total citation count, H-index, and expert opinion were some of the primary metrics used to identify the most influential papers. This method is subject to significant bias. The disruption score was initially created with the intent of measuring the degree to which a publication introduces a new idea, is repeatedly referenced and may be used as an additional publication evaluation metric.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!