Objectives: Saphenous nerve injury is the most common complication after surgical treatment of varicose veins. The aim of this study was to establish its frequency at great saphenous vein long stripping when four methods of surgery were applied.

Methods: Eighty patients were divided into four groups depending on different stripping methods. Sensory transmission in saphenous nerve and sensory perception of shank were examined before surgery and two weeks, three and six months afterwards with clinical neurophysiology methods.

Results: In 36% of patients, surgeries caused the injury of saphenous nerve mainly by proximal stripping without invagination (65%, group I). Transmission disturbances ceased completely after three months in patients undergoing distal stripping with invagination (group IV), while in group I they persisted for six months in 35%. Group IV patients were the least injured and group I the most.

Conclusion: Neurophysiological findings may suggest that distal stripping with vein invagination gives the best saphenous nerve sparing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4390525PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0268355514539316DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

saphenous nerve
20
saphenous vein
8
nerve injury
8
stripping methods
8
three months
8
stripping invagination
8
distal stripping
8
saphenous
7
stripping
6
nerve
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!