Background: Ectocortical resorbable plate fixation has become a standard method of fixation during fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) in young children. Plate hydrolysis occurs slowly and can cause visible prominences, sterile abscesses, and osseous depressions that can persist after complete resorption. Although endocortical placement avoids contour issues, the safety and effectiveness of this technique are undocumented.
Methods: A review of our prospectively collected craniofacial database was performed. All patients undergoing FOA by a single craniofacial team at a single institution from 1997 to 2011 were examined. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) unicoronal, bicoronal, or metopic synostosis; (2) resorbable endocortical fixation of the bandeau; and (3) follow-up for 1 year or longer. Evaluation included patient demographic data, postoperative clinical course, and computed tomography imaging when available.
Results: Seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Fusion involved the unicoronal (n = 26), bicoronal (n = 19), and metopic (n = 28) sutures. Mean age at operation was 8.3 months (range, 2.7-35.5 mo), and follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 1.0-9.9 y). No endocortical or ectocortical sterile abscesses were documented in our series. Postoperative complications included hematoma (n = 2), infection (n = 2), wound breakdown (n = 3), cerebral contusion (n = 2), and cerebrospinal fluid leak (n = 1); none of these issues were related to endocortical absorbable fixation. Fifty-eight patients (80%) were categorized as Whitaker classification I/II; and 15 patients (20%), Whitaker classification III/IV. Postoperative computed tomography (mean follow-up, 4.6 y) was obtained in 34 patients (47%). All plates were completely resorbed, and there were no bone or soft tissue irregularities in the region where the plates were placed.
Conclusions: Endocortical resorbable fixation is a safe and effective method of osseous stabilization during FOA for craniosynostosis in young children.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000810 | DOI Listing |
J Craniomaxillofac Surg
January 2025
Private Clinic, Cinnah street, No:37/26, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address:
Craniosynostosis causes functional and aesthetic problems that require fronto-orbital advancement in patients to correct the cranial deformity and to prevent functional problems due to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). In this study, demographic information, operative details, preoperative clinical findings, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed for 106 craniosynostosis patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. Many factors such as functional losses due to increased ICP before surgery, resynostosis, fronto-orbital relapse, surgical complications and aesthetic results were compared in syndromic and non-syndromic patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
December 2024
Member of Sociedad Argentina de Ortodoncia, Member of International Society of Craneofacial Surgery, Member of Asociación Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Craniofacial syndromes present with exorbitism and airway obstruction as a result of upper and middle facial hypoplasia. Classical subcranial Lefort III (LF III) or monobloc distraction osteogenesis (DO) using an external craniofacial device is used to treat these deformities. These procedures are done during mixed dentition, in most cases, advancing an abnormal face, to a more normal position.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Division of Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery, Nemours Children's Health, Jacksonville, FL.
External rigid distraction is an established method for achieving subcranial Le Fort III advancement in severe syndromic craniosynostosis. Craniofacial surgeons commonly use halo-type devices for these corrections, as they allow for multiple vectors of pull and facilitate larger midfacial advancements. Although most complications related to their use involve pin displacement or infection, rare complications such as skull fractures have been reported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Comput Assist Radiol Surg
December 2024
Medical Additive Manufacturing Research Group (Swiss MAM), Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Purpose: The use of computer-assisted virtual surgical planning (VSP) for craniosynostosis surgery is gaining increasing implementation in the clinics. However, accurately transferring the preoperative planning data to the operating room remains challenging. We introduced and investigated a fully digital workflow to perform fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) surgery using 3D-printed patient-specific implants (PSIs) and cold-ablation robot-guided laser osteotomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
December 2024
Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles.
Fronto-orbital retrusion may occur after primary surgical correction of craniosynostosis, particularly in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. This study investigated reoperation rates and factors contributing to FO relapse among this cohort. A retrospective review evaluated reoperation for FO relapse in patients with syndromic multisuture craniosynostosis who underwent primary fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) + calvarial vault remodeling (CVR) at our institution between 2004 and 2024.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!