Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsies: emphasis on diagnostic yield.

Acta Neurochir (Wien)

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Published: August 2014

Background: Studies regarding frameless stereotactic brain biopsy mainly report high diagnostic yield (DY) as opposed to relatively low diagnostic accuracy. This discrepancy raises the question of the certainty and precision of obtained diagnoses. This article proposes a DY definition encompassing diagnostic certainty and precision according to the World Health Organization (WHO) central nervous system (CNS) tumour classification system. Furthermore, our eight-year experience with this procedure is reviewed and evaluated.

Methods: A consecutive series of 235 frameless biopsy procedures was reviewed. Criteria were set up for categorising obtained diagnoses. All cases were included in a predictive factor analysis of inconclusive biopsy and postoperative complications.

Results: According to our predefined DY criteria, the DY was 72.8 %. The inconclusive biopsy outcome measured 21.7 %; the non-diagnostic biopsy outcome was 5.5 %. The only predictive factor found for inconclusive biopsy procedures was age under 30. Predictive factors for postoperative complications, which were found statistically significant after multivariable analysis, were glucose level and intra-operative haemorrhage. The total morbidity rate was 8.5 %, including a mortality rate of 0.9 %.

Conclusions: Although frameless stereotactic brain biopsy procedures are considered to be relatively safe, the true DY is significantly less than previously reported, most probably due to the lack of standardised DY criteria. Based on our DY definition and subsequent DY findings, standardisation of DY criteria and definition is paramount for biopsy diagnosis interpretation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2145-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stereotactic brain
12
biopsy procedures
12
inconclusive biopsy
12
diagnostic yield
8
frameless stereotactic
8
biopsy
8
brain biopsy
8
certainty precision
8
predictive factor
8
biopsy outcome
8

Similar Publications

Purpose In linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) utilizing a multileaf collimator (MLC) for brain metastases (BMs), a volumetric-modulated arc (VMA) technique is indispensable for generating a suitable dose distribution with efficient planning and delivery. However, the optimal calculation grid spacing (GS) and statistical uncertainty (SU) of the Monte Carlo algorithm for VMA optimization have yet to be determined. This planning study aimed to examine the impacts of GS and GU settings on VMA-based SRS planning and to find the optimal combination for templating.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) are complex vascular pathologies with a significant risk of hemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment modality for AVM, initially popularized on the Gamma Knife (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) platform, and now benefits from the modern advances in linear accelerator (LINAC)-based platforms. This study evaluates the outcomes of LINAC-based SRS/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hFSRT) for cerebral AVMs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Frame-based Stereotactic Brain Biopsy (FSBB) is a minimally invasive procedure with a view to increasing the diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and safety of FSBB with the help of the intraoperative 3D O-ARM system. A preoperative MRI allowed for targeting the tissue to be sampled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Successful deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires precise electrode placement. However, brain shift from loss of cerebrospinal fluid or pneumocephalus still affects aim accuracy. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) provides absolute spatial sensitivity, and intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography (iCBCT) has become increasingly used in DBS procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The Transorbital and supraorbital minimally invasive approaches have been defined to reach intraorbital structures, adjacent sinuses, skull base, and other intracranial targets in this region. These approaches reduce the possible cosmetic and brain retraction-related morbidities caused by traditional transcranial approaches. Although these pathways are being studied endoscopically, a stereotactic approach has not been defined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!