What factors influence applicants' rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the National Resident Matching Program?

Clin Orthop Relat Res

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA,

Published: September 2014

AI Article Synopsis

  • * The research was based on responses from 207 out of 742 applicants to a 2013 orthopaedic surgery residency program, who ranked 37 potential factors influencing their decisions.
  • * Key findings reveal that women prioritize personal interactions and family proximity more than men do, and a significant percentage of women (68%) have dismissed programs due to perceived sex biases, highlighting the need for greater awareness of diversity and interpersonal factors in residency selection.

Article Abstract

Background: In accordance with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' strategic goal of enriching our field by building a more diverse orthopaedic workforce, the specialty needs further information delineating the factors important to the applicant pool as a whole and more specifically to women and other underrepresented minority groups.

Questions/purposes: This study aims to identify (1) factors important to residency applicants selecting an orthopaedic residency program; (2) differences in factor importance for men, women, and minorities, and (3) the importance of different information sources used when making his or her rank list.

Methods: All 742 applicants who applied to the authors' orthopaedic surgery residency program in the 2013 National Resident Matching Program were queried. The response rate was 28% (207 of 742). Respondents were asked to rank, on a 5-point Likert scale, 37 factors that may have affected their rank lists to differing degrees. Respondents also identified the importance of sources of information used to make their rank lists, factors that residency programs considered important when ranking applicants, and their level of agreement with various sex- and racial-specific statements regarding orthopaedic training.

Results: The most important factors affecting rank lists were perceived happiness/quality of life of current residents, resident camaraderie, and impression after an away rotation. Women weighed their personal interactions and a program's proximity to family and friends more heavily when determining a rank list. Sixty-eight percent of women eliminated residency programs from their options based on perceived sex biases versus less than 1% of men. Applicants valued information obtained from away rotations at an institution and in talking with current residents most when determining his or her rank list.

Conclusions: Programs should consider interpersonal factors, like quality of life and resident camaraderie as factors in attracting applicants. They also should minimize perceived biases and emphasize interactions with current residents during the application process to meet their goals of attracting an exceptional and more diverse orthopaedic workforce.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4117903PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3692-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residency programs
12
rank lists
12
current residents
12
factors
8
orthopaedic surgery
8
surgery residency
8
national resident
8
resident matching
8
diverse orthopaedic
8
orthopaedic workforce
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!