Introduction: To assess the efficacy of herbal medicines as a treatment of cancer cachexia.

Methods And Analysis: We will search the following 13 electronic databases from their inception. MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Journal Integration Platform (VIP) and six Korean Medical Databases (KoreaMed, the Korean Traditional knowledge Portal, OASIS, DBPIA, the Research Information Service System and the Korean Studies Information Service System) without restrictions on time or language. The data will be extracted independently by two authors using predefined criteria. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion between the authors. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Dissemination: The review will be published in a journal. The review will also be disseminated electronically and in print. An update of the review will be conducted to inform and guide healthcare practice and policy.

Trial Registration Number: PROSPERO 2013:CRD42013006612.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4054631PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

review will
12
herbal medicines
8
service system
8
risk bias
8
will
7
medicines cancer
4
cancer cachexia
4
cachexia protocol
4
protocol systematic
4
review
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!